TY - JOUR
T1 - Environmental outcomes of the US Renewable Fuel Standard
AU - Lark, Tyler J.
AU - Hendricks, Nathan P.
AU - Smith, Aaron
AU - Pates, Nicholas
AU - Spawn-Lee, Seth A.
AU - Bougie, Matthew
AU - Booth, Eric G.
AU - Kucharik, Christopher J.
AU - Gibbs, Holly K.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
PY - 2022/3/1
Y1 - 2022/3/1
N2 - The Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) specifies the use of biofuels in the United States and thereby guides nearly half of all global biofuel production, yet outcomes of this keystone climate and environmental regulation remain unclear. Here we combine econometric analyses, land use observations, and biophysical models to estimate the realized effects of the RFS in aggregate and down to the scale of individual agricultural fields across the United States. We find that the RFS increased corn prices by 30% and the prices of other crops by 20%, which, in turn, expanded US corn cultivation by 2.8 Mha (8.7%) and total cropland by 2.1 Mha (2.4%) in the years following policy enactment (2008 to 2016). These changes increased annual nationwide fertilizer use by 3 to 8%, increased water quality degradants by 3 to 5%, and caused enough domestic land use change emissions such that the carbon intensity of corn ethanol produced under the RFS is no less than gasoline and likely at least 24% higher. These tradeoffs must be weighed alongside the benefits of biofuels as decision-makers consider the future of renewable energy policies and the potential for fuels like corn ethanol to meet climate mitigation goals.
AB - The Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) specifies the use of biofuels in the United States and thereby guides nearly half of all global biofuel production, yet outcomes of this keystone climate and environmental regulation remain unclear. Here we combine econometric analyses, land use observations, and biophysical models to estimate the realized effects of the RFS in aggregate and down to the scale of individual agricultural fields across the United States. We find that the RFS increased corn prices by 30% and the prices of other crops by 20%, which, in turn, expanded US corn cultivation by 2.8 Mha (8.7%) and total cropland by 2.1 Mha (2.4%) in the years following policy enactment (2008 to 2016). These changes increased annual nationwide fertilizer use by 3 to 8%, increased water quality degradants by 3 to 5%, and caused enough domestic land use change emissions such that the carbon intensity of corn ethanol produced under the RFS is no less than gasoline and likely at least 24% higher. These tradeoffs must be weighed alongside the benefits of biofuels as decision-makers consider the future of renewable energy policies and the potential for fuels like corn ethanol to meet climate mitigation goals.
KW - Biofuels
KW - Environmental policy
KW - Greenhouse gas emissions
KW - Land use change
KW - Water quality
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85124613853&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85124613853&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1073/pnas.2101084119
DO - 10.1073/pnas.2101084119
M3 - Article
C2 - 35165202
AN - SCOPUS:85124613853
SN - 0027-8424
VL - 119
JO - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
JF - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
IS - 9
M1 - e2101084119
ER -