Erratum: Direct vs Delayed Triplet Energy Transfer from Organic Semiconductors to Quantum Dots and Implications for Luminescent Harvesting of Triplet Excitons (ACS Nano (2020) 14: 4 (4224−4234) DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.9b09339)

Victor Gray, Jesse R. Allardice, Zhilong Zhang, Simon Dowland, James Xiao, Anthony Petty, John E. Anthony, Neil C. Greenham, Akshay Rao

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

Abstract

The numbers referring to the ligand coverage were incorrectly reported in the Results/Discussion section. The previous numbers read: “The ligand coverage was within the range 1.6−1.9 TET-CA/nm2 for all sizes of QDs”. The corrected numbers should read: “The ligand coverage was within the range 0.45−0.7 TET-CA/nm2 for all sizes of QDs”. See below for the updated Table S1 and Figure S2. (Table Presented). These changes do not alter any of the discussion or conclusions made in the article. (Figure Presented).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)10748-10749
Number of pages2
JournalACS Nano
Volume14
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 25 2020

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 American Chemical Society.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Materials Science (all)
  • Engineering (all)
  • Physics and Astronomy (all)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Erratum: Direct vs Delayed Triplet Energy Transfer from Organic Semiconductors to Quantum Dots and Implications for Luminescent Harvesting of Triplet Excitons (ACS Nano (2020) 14: 4 (4224−4234) DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.9b09339)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this