Abstract
Reproducibility is a defining feature of science, but the extent to which it characterizes current research is unknown. We conducted replications of 100 experimental and correlational studies published in three psychology journals using high-powered designs and original materials when available. Replication effects were half the magnitude of original effects, representing a substantial decline. Ninety-seven percent of original studies had statistically significant results. Thirty-six percent of replications had statistically significant results; 47% of original effect sizes were in the 95% confidence interval of the replication effect size; 39% of effects were subjectively rated to have replicated the original result; and if no bias in original results is assumed, combining original and replication results left 68% with statistically significant effects. Correlational tests suggest that replication success was better predicted by the strength of original evidence than by characteristics of the original and replication teams.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | aac4716 |
Journal | Science |
Volume | 349 |
Issue number | 6251 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Aug 28 2015 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:A.H. is supported by the Earth and Natural Sciences Doctoral Studies Programme, which is funded by the Higher Education Authority (HEA) through the Programme for Research at Third Level Institutions, Cycle 5 (PRTLI-5) and is cofunded by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF)". M.K. is supported by the Enterprise Ireland Competence Centre for Biorefining & Biofuels (CC/2009/1305A) and INTERREG IVB NEW REsource Innovation Network for European Waste Project No. 317J-RENEW. S.D. is supported by Science Foundation Ireland, under Grant No. 799 06/CP/E007. Experimental campaign was financially supported by the EU project Biomass Research Infrastructure for Sharing Knowledge (BRISK).
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General