TY - JOUR
T1 - Ethical tensions in research
T2 - The influence of metatheoretical orientation on research ethics
AU - Barriage, Sarah
AU - Buente, Wayne
AU - Greifeneder, Elke
AU - Greyson, Devon
AU - Kitzie, Vanessa
AU - Morales, Miraida
AU - Todd, Ross
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2016 by Association for Information Science and Technology
Copyright:
Copyright 2017 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - When developing one's own research agenda, early and mid-career researchers continually negotiate how best to meet ethical standards and resolve ethical constraints using methodologically sound approaches. Often such struggles occur behind closed doors, their outcomes reflected in the institutional language of an ethical review board. This panel seeks to bring these struggles to the forefront by having panelists who study various populations discuss how they approach ethical challenges in their research. Due to the nature of the groups these panelists study, the panel provides a context where the site of ethical struggles, challenges, and tensions are exacerbated. Key issues to be discussed are: informed consent, risks to participants, and research design and dissemination. Discussion of these issues will be oriented around each participant's metatheoretical orientation to research in library and information science (LIS). Adopting such an approach will highlight some of the main challenges when engaging in ethical practices that may not align with institutional standards, as well as denote possible strategies for addressing them.
AB - When developing one's own research agenda, early and mid-career researchers continually negotiate how best to meet ethical standards and resolve ethical constraints using methodologically sound approaches. Often such struggles occur behind closed doors, their outcomes reflected in the institutional language of an ethical review board. This panel seeks to bring these struggles to the forefront by having panelists who study various populations discuss how they approach ethical challenges in their research. Due to the nature of the groups these panelists study, the panel provides a context where the site of ethical struggles, challenges, and tensions are exacerbated. Key issues to be discussed are: informed consent, risks to participants, and research design and dissemination. Discussion of these issues will be oriented around each participant's metatheoretical orientation to research in library and information science (LIS). Adopting such an approach will highlight some of the main challenges when engaging in ethical practices that may not align with institutional standards, as well as denote possible strategies for addressing them.
KW - Research ethics
KW - metatheory
KW - methodology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85015282922&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85015282922&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/pra2.2016.14505301026
DO - 10.1002/pra2.2016.14505301026
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85015282922
VL - 53
SP - 1
EP - 3
JO - Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology
JF - Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology
IS - 1
ER -