Ethics and the Geography–Military Nexus: Responses to Wainwright and Weaver

Reuben Rose-Redwood; Eric Sheppard; Geraldine Pratt; Susan M. Roberts; Mark R. Read; Chris Fuhriman; Emily T. Yeh

doi:10.1080/24694452.2022.2042182

Ethics and the Geography–Military Nexus: Responses to Wainwright and Weaver

Reuben Rose-Redwood, Eric Sheppard, Geraldine Pratt, Susan M. Roberts, Mark R. Read, Chris Fuhriman, Emily T. Yeh

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

This commentary includes a series of responses to Wainwright and Weaver’s “A Critical Commentary on the AAG Geography and Military Study Committee Report.” The contributors’ responses vary from the sympathetic to the critical, yet all agree that geographers’ engagements with military and intelligence organizations can be fraught with ethical issues that deserve careful consideration. The aim of this commentary is therefore to contribute to the ongoing debate over ethics and the geography–military nexus.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	e-i-evi
Journal	Annals of the American Association of Geographers
Volume	112
Issue number	7
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2022.2042182
State	Published - 2022

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 by American Association of Geographers.

Keywords

AAG Geography and Military Study Committee Report
AAG Statement on Professional Ethics
academic freedom
ethics
military

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Geography, Planning and Development
Earth-Surface Processes

Access to Document

10.1080/24694452.2022.2042182

Cite this

@article{e727740942394dcf9b0df9dde6ab3c59,

title = "Ethics and the Geography–Military Nexus: Responses to Wainwright and Weaver",

abstract = "This commentary includes a series of responses to Wainwright and Weaver{\textquoteright}s “A Critical Commentary on the AAG Geography and Military Study Committee Report.” The contributors{\textquoteright} responses vary from the sympathetic to the critical, yet all agree that geographers{\textquoteright} engagements with military and intelligence organizations can be fraught with ethical issues that deserve careful consideration. The aim of this commentary is therefore to contribute to the ongoing debate over ethics and the geography–military nexus.",

keywords = "AAG Geography and Military Study Committee Report, AAG Statement on Professional Ethics, academic freedom, ethics, military",

author = "Reuben Rose-Redwood and Eric Sheppard and Geraldine Pratt and Roberts, {Susan M.} and Read, {Mark R.} and Chris Fuhriman and Yeh, {Emily T.}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 by American Association of Geographers.",

year = "2022",

doi = "10.1080/24694452.2022.2042182",

language = "English",

volume = "112",

pages = "e--i--evi",

number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ethics and the Geography–Military Nexus

T2 - Responses to Wainwright and Weaver

AU - Rose-Redwood, Reuben

AU - Sheppard, Eric

AU - Pratt, Geraldine

AU - Roberts, Susan M.

AU - Read, Mark R.

AU - Fuhriman, Chris

AU - Yeh, Emily T.

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - This commentary includes a series of responses to Wainwright and Weaver’s “A Critical Commentary on the AAG Geography and Military Study Committee Report.” The contributors’ responses vary from the sympathetic to the critical, yet all agree that geographers’ engagements with military and intelligence organizations can be fraught with ethical issues that deserve careful consideration. The aim of this commentary is therefore to contribute to the ongoing debate over ethics and the geography–military nexus.

AB - This commentary includes a series of responses to Wainwright and Weaver’s “A Critical Commentary on the AAG Geography and Military Study Committee Report.” The contributors’ responses vary from the sympathetic to the critical, yet all agree that geographers’ engagements with military and intelligence organizations can be fraught with ethical issues that deserve careful consideration. The aim of this commentary is therefore to contribute to the ongoing debate over ethics and the geography–military nexus.

KW - AAG Geography and Military Study Committee Report

KW - AAG Statement on Professional Ethics

KW - academic freedom

KW - ethics

KW - military

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85129683938&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85129683938&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/24694452.2022.2042182

DO - 10.1080/24694452.2022.2042182

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85129683938

SN - 2469-4452

VL - 112

SP - e-i-evi

JO - Annals of the American Association of Geographers

JF - Annals of the American Association of Geographers

IS - 7

ER -

Ethics and the Geography–Military Nexus: Responses to Wainwright and Weaver

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this