Ethics and the Geography–Military Nexus: Responses to Wainwright and Weaver

Reuben Rose-Redwood, Eric Sheppard, Geraldine Pratt, Susan M. Roberts, Mark R. Read, Chris Fuhriman, Emily T. Yeh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This commentary includes a series of responses to Wainwright and Weaver’s “A Critical Commentary on the AAG Geography and Military Study Committee Report.” The contributors’ responses vary from the sympathetic to the critical, yet all agree that geographers’ engagements with military and intelligence organizations can be fraught with ethical issues that deserve careful consideration. The aim of this commentary is therefore to contribute to the ongoing debate over ethics and the geography–military nexus.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)e-i-evi
JournalAnnals of the American Association of Geographers
Volume112
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - 2022

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 by American Association of Geographers.

Keywords

  • AAG Geography and Military Study Committee Report
  • AAG Statement on Professional Ethics
  • academic freedom
  • ethics
  • military

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Earth-Surface Processes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Ethics and the Geography–Military Nexus: Responses to Wainwright and Weaver'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this