This commentary includes a series of responses to Wainwright and Weaver’s “A Critical Commentary on the AAG Geography and Military Study Committee Report.” The contributors’ responses vary from the sympathetic to the critical, yet all agree that geographers’ engagements with military and intelligence organizations can be fraught with ethical issues that deserve careful consideration. The aim of this commentary is therefore to contribute to the ongoing debate over ethics and the geography–military nexus.
|Journal||Annals of the American Association of Geographers|
|State||Published - 2022|
Bibliographical notePublisher Copyright:
© 2022 by American Association of Geographers.
- AAG Geography and Military Study Committee Report
- AAG Statement on Professional Ethics
- academic freedom
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Geography, Planning and Development
- Earth-Surface Processes