Abstract
The U.S. federal government’s requirements and guidance for wetland conservation are reflected in a series of federal laws, regulations, and policies. However, the degree to which these requirements are reflected in local planning efforts is unclear. This study using five components with 56 indicators evaluates how well wetland conservation efforts are integrated into 112 local comprehensive plans in Nebraska, USA. The results show that the majority of local comprehensive plans pay little direct attention to wetland conservation, although many conservation efforts are conducted under the umbrella of environmental protection frameworks. The indicators include water resource protection received the highest score and was the descriptor of natural or environmental resources and resulted in the highest level of local awareness on natural assets. The indicator of setting goals for no net loss of wetlands received the lowest score among all indicators, demonstrating a clear gap between the national vision and the local reality of wetland conservation. Findings suggest local governments need more direct and proactive inputs to improve wetland conservation. Further findings from this research provide a practical roadmap for planners globally, particularly for the developing countries, to integrate wetland conservation into the local planning systems.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 2070550 |
| Journal | Ecosystem Health and Sustainability |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2022 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2022 The Author(s). Published by Taylor & Francis Group and Science Press on behalf of the Ecological Society of China.
Funding
This paper is supported by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Wetland Program Development Grants. The contents do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the funding agencies and do not mention the trade names or commercial products that constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. The research team sincerely appreciates the valuable guidance and professional technical support from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the US Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service, the Rainwater Basin Joint Venture, and the Nebraska Game and Parks Commission. We really appreciate the anonymous reviewers for their precious time to carefully review the manuscript. Their valuable comments and constructive suggestions greatly help improve the quality of this paper. This work was supported by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [CD97790401] and [CD 97763501]. This paper is supported by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Wetland Program Development Grants. The contents do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the funding agencies and do not mention the trade names or commercial products that constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. The research team sincerely appreciates the valuable guidance and professional technical support from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the US Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service, the Rainwater Basin Joint Venture, and the Nebraska Game and Parks Commission. We really appreciate the anonymous reviewers for their precious time to carefully review the manuscript. Their valuable comments and constructive suggestions greatly help improve the quality of this paper.
| Funders | Funder number |
|---|---|
| U.S. Environmental Protection Agency | CD 97763501, CD97790401 |
| U.S. Environmental Protection Agency | |
| U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service | |
| USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Conservation Innovation | |
| Nebraska Game and Parks Commission |
Keywords
- Wetland
- conservation
- integration
- local comprehensive plan
- nebraska
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- Ecology
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law