Evaluation of Biased and Balanced Salvinorin A Analogs in Preclinical Models of Pain

Kelly F. Paton, Andrew Biggerstaff, Sophia Kaska, Rachel S. Crowley, Anne C. La Flamme, Thomas E. Prisinzano, Bronwyn M. Kivell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

27 Scopus citations

Abstract

In the search for safer, non-addictive analgesics, kappa opioid receptor (KOPr) agonists are a potential target, as unlike mu-opioid analgesics, they do not have abuse potential. Salvinorin A (SalA) is a potent and selective KOPr agonist, however, clinical utility is limited by the short duration of action and aversive side effects. Biasing KOPr signaling toward G-protein activation has been highlighted as a key cellular mechanism to reduce the side effects of KOPr agonists. The present study investigated KOPr signaling bias and the acute antinociceptive effects and side effects of two novel analogs of SalA, 16-Bromo SalA and 16-Ethynyl SalA. 16-Bromo SalA showed G-protein signaling bias, whereas 16-Ethynyl SalA displayed balanced signaling properties. In the dose-response tail-withdrawal assay, SalA, 16-Ethynyl SalA and 16-Bromo SalA were more potent than the traditional KOPr agonist U50,488, and 16-Ethynyl SalA was more efficacious. 16-Ethynyl SalA and 16-Bromo SalA both had a longer duration of action in the warm water tail-withdrawal assay, and 16-Ethynyl had greater antinociceptive effect in the hot-plate assay, compared to SalA. In the intraplantar 2% formaldehyde test, 16-Ethynyl SalA and 16-Bromo SalA significantly reduced both nociceptive and inflammatory pain-related behaviors. Moreover, 16-Ethynyl SalA and 16-Bromo SalA had no anxiogenic effects in the marble burying task, and 16-Bromo SalA did not alter behavior in the elevated zero maze. Overall, 16-Ethynyl SalA significantly attenuated acute pain-related behaviors in multiple preclinical models, while the biased KOPr agonist, 16-Bromo SalA, displayed modest antinociceptive effects, and lacked anxiogenic effects.

Original languageEnglish
Article number765
JournalFrontiers in Neuroscience
Volume14
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 21 2020

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© Copyright © 2020 Paton, Biggerstaff, Kaska, Crowley, La Flamme, Prisinzano and Kivell.

Funding

The authors would like to acknowledge Amy Alder and Kendra Boyes for their technical assistance and Stacey Parbhu for animal husbandry. Funding. This work was supported by the Health Research Council – Explorer grant (Grant Number 16/646 to BK) and the National Institute on Drug Abuse (Grant Number DA018151 to TP). KP received a doctoral scholarship from Victoria University of Wellington.

FundersFunder number
Author National Institute on Drug Abuse DA031791 Mark J Ferris National Institute on Drug Abuse DA006634 Mark J Ferris National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism AA026117 Mark J Ferris National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism AA028162 Elizabeth G Pitts National Institute of General Medical Sciences GM102773 Elizabeth G Pitts Peter McManus Charitable Trust Mark J Ferris National Institute on Drug AbuseDA018151
Author National Institute on Drug Abuse DA031791 Mark J Ferris National Institute on Drug Abuse DA006634 Mark J Ferris National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism AA026117 Mark J Ferris National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism AA028162 Elizabeth G Pitts National Institute of General Medical Sciences GM102773 Elizabeth G Pitts Peter McManus Charitable Trust Mark J Ferris National Institute on Drug Abuse
Health Research Council of New Zealand16/646
Health Research Council of New Zealand
Victoria University of Wellington

    Keywords

    • Salvinorin A
    • antinociception
    • anxiety
    • biased agonism
    • kappa opioid receptor

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • General Neuroscience

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluation of Biased and Balanced Salvinorin A Analogs in Preclinical Models of Pain'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this