Abstract
Background: Red blood cell (RBC) transfusion is a critical supportive therapy in cardiovascular surgery (CVS). Donor selection and testing have reduced the risk of transfusion-transmitted infections; however, risks remain from bacteria, emerging viruses, pathogens for which testing is not performed and from residual donor leukocytes. Amustaline (S-303)/glutathione (GSH) treatment pathogen reduction technology is designed to inactivate a broad spectrum of infectious agents and leukocytes in RBC concentrates. The ReCePI study is a Phase 3 clinical trial designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pathogen-reduced RBCs transfused for acute anemia in CVS compared to conventional RBCs, and to assess the clinical significance of treatment-emergent RBC antibodies. Methods: ReCePI is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, active-controlled, parallel-design, non-inferiority study. Eligible subjects will be randomized up to 7 days before surgery to receive either leukoreduced Test (pathogen reduced) or Control (conventional) RBCs from surgery up to day 7 post-surgery. The primary efficacy endpoint is the proportion of patients transfused with at least one study transfusion with an acute kidney injury (AKI) diagnosis defined as any increased serum creatinine (sCr) level ≥ 0.3 mg/dL (or 26.5 µmol/L) from pre-surgery baseline within 48 ± 4 h of the end of surgery. The primary safety endpoints are the proportion of patients with any treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) related to study RBC transfusion through 28 days, and the proportion of patients with treatment-emergent antibodies with confirmed specificity to pathogen-reduced RBCs through 75 days after the last study transfusion. With ≥ 292 evaluable, transfused patients (> 146 per arm), the study has 80% power to demonstrate non-inferiority, defined as a Test group AKI incidence increase of no more than 50% of the Control group rate, assuming a Control incidence of 30%. Discussion: RBCs are transfused to prevent tissue hypoxia caused by surgery-induced bleeding and anemia. AKI is a sensitive indicator of renal hypoxia and a novel endpoint for assessing RBC efficacy. The ReCePI study is intended to demonstrate the non-inferiority of pathogen-reduced RBCs to conventional RBCs in the support of renal tissue oxygenation due to acute anemia and to characterize the incidence of treatment-related antibodies to RBCs.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 799 |
| Journal | Trials |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Dec 2023 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2023, The Author(s).
Funding
The ReCePI study is funded by a contract with the US Department of Health and Human Services, Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (HHS010020160009c) with Cerus Corporation. The ReCePI study group includes sub-investigators, transfusion service directors, study coordinators, clinical, transfusion service, and research staff at each clinical center. The Sponsors acknowledge the multiple reviews and guiding advice of the DSMB, and the enormous contribution of the staff of the blood centers for the collection and manufacture of study RBC components: Central California Blood Center, Fresno, CA; American Red Cross, Philadelphia, PA; OneBlood, Orlando, FL and Vitalant Research Institute, Denver CO.
| Funders |
|---|
| Central California Blood Center |
| DSMB |
| Vitalant Research Institute |
| U.S. Department of Health and Human Services |
| American Red Cross |
| Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority |
Keywords
- Acute kidney injury
- Amustaline/GSH
- Cardiac surgery
- INTERCEPT
- Pathogen reduction
- Randomized controlled trial
- Transfusion-transmitted infections
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Medicine (miscellaneous)
- Pharmacology (medical)
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of amustaline/glutathione pathogen-reduced RBCs in complex cardiac surgery: the Red Cell Pathogen Inactivation (ReCePI) study—protocol for a phase 3, randomized, controlled trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver