Evidence that logical reasoning depends on conscious processing

C. Nathan DeWall, Roy F. Baumeister, E. J. Masicampo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

57 Scopus citations

Abstract

Humans, unlike other animals, are equipped with a powerful brain that permits conscious awareness and reflection. A growing trend in psychological science has questioned the benefits of consciousness, however. Testing a hypothesis advanced by [Lieberman, M. D., Gaunt, R., Gilbert, D. T., & Trope, Y. (2002). Reflection and reflexion: A social cognitive neuroscience approach to attributional inference. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 199-249], four studies suggested that the conscious, reflective processing system is vital for logical reasoning. Substantial decrements in logical reasoning were found when a cognitive load manipulation preoccupied conscious processing, while hampering the nonconscious system with consciously suppressed thoughts failed to impair reasoning (Experiment 1). Nonconscious activation (priming) of the idea of logical reasoning increased the activation of logic-relevant concepts, but failed to improve logical reasoning performance (Experiments 2a-2c) unless the logical conclusions were largely intuitive and thus not reliant on logical reasoning (Experiment 3). Meanwhile, stimulating the conscious goal of reasoning well led to improvements in reasoning performance (Experiment 4). These findings offer evidence that logical reasoning is aided by the conscious, reflective processing system.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)628-645
Number of pages18
JournalConsciousness and Cognition
Volume17
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2008

Keywords

  • Consciousness
  • Logical reasoning
  • Motivation
  • Priming
  • Volition

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evidence that logical reasoning depends on conscious processing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this