Examining rural health equity and impact through the translational science benefits model: outcomes from the CTSA Consortium of Rural States (CORES)

Maggie Padek, Rebecca Butcher, Rebecca deLacerda Allen, Hilary L. Surratt, Maran Subramain, Beth Tigges, Alyson G. Eggleston, Jessica H. Presley, Trent Matheson, Nasser Sharareh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Introduction: Rural communities often lack access to healthcare, have limited resources and infrastructure, and may experience suboptimal translation of evidence-based interventions into practice or measurement of translational research impact. The Consortium of Rural States (CORES), comprising eight Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) hubs, is a research consortium that focuses on clinical and translational research impacting rural health. Methods: Utilizing the Translational Science Benefits Model (TSBM) framework, each CTSA hub’s evaluation lead co-created an inventory of rural-focused activities, projects, and initiatives that occurred at their respective site during the funding period 2021–2023. Variables included program area; activity type and description; target population; activity status; outputs; and short-term outcomes. The evaluators then mapped site outcomes according to the four TSBM domains (clinical, community, economic, policy) and 30 subcategories (benefits). Results: 184 rural-focused activities, projects and initiatives were identified across the hubs. All rural-focused efforts involved impacts in the Community and Clinical domains of the TSBM, with >60% focusing on Community impacts. These results suggest an opportunity gap to better define Economic and Policy-level impacts in the context of rural-focused initiatives. Discussion: This work demonstrates a novel mapping of the TSBM to rural health research settings and explores the nuances of using the concepts and domains of the TSBM as a coding tool. This work gives the Consortium insight on the types of projects and impacts that are supported and how to prioritize more exploration of the full range of translational science benefits in rural health initiatives going forward.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1538494
JournalFrontiers in Public Health
Volume13
DOIs
StatePublished - 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2025 Padek, Butcher, deLacerda Allen, Surratt, Subramain, Tigges, Eggleston, Presley, Matheson and Sharareh.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under the Award Number UL1TR002366, UM1TR004409, UM1TR004909, UM1TR004403, UL1TR001998, UM1TR004772, UL1TR002014, and UL1TR001449. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

FundersFunder number
National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS)
National Institutes of Health (NIH)UM1TR004909, UM1TR004772, UL1TR001998, UL1TR002014, UL1TR002366, UM1TR004409, UL1TR001449, UM1TR004403
National Institutes of Health (NIH)

    Keywords

    • CTSA
    • impact evaluation
    • rural health
    • translational science
    • TSBM

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Examining rural health equity and impact through the translational science benefits model: outcomes from the CTSA Consortium of Rural States (CORES)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this