TY - JOUR
T1 - Expanded mental health benefits and outpatient depression treatment intensity
AU - Lo Sasso, Anthony T.
AU - Lindrooth, Richard C.
AU - Lurie, Ithai Z.
AU - Lyons, John S.
PY - 2006/4
Y1 - 2006/4
N2 - Background: The justification for higher cost-sharing for behavioral health treatment is its greater price sensitivity relative to general healthcare treatment. Despite this, recent policy efforts have focused on improving access to behavioral health treatment. Objectives: We measured the effects on outpatient treatment of depression of a change in mental health benefits for employees of a large U.S.-based corporation. Research Design: The benefit change involved 3 major elements: reduced copayments for mental health treatment, the implementation of a selective contracting network, and an effort to destigmatize mental illness. Claims data and a difference-in-differences methodology were used to examine how the benefit change affected outpatient treatment of depression. Subjects: Subjects consisted of 214,517 employee-years of data for individuals who were continuously enrolled for at least 1 full year at the intervention company and 96,365 employee-years in the control group. Measures: We measured initiation into treatment of depression and the number of outpatient therapy visits. Results: The benefit change was associated with a 26% increase in the probability of initiating depression treatment. Conditional on initiating treatment, patients in the intervention company received 1.2 additional (P < 0.001) outpatient mental health treatment visits relative to the control group. Conclusions: Our results suggest that the overall effect of the company's benefit change was to significantly increase the number of outpatient visits per episode of treatment conditional on treatment initiation.
AB - Background: The justification for higher cost-sharing for behavioral health treatment is its greater price sensitivity relative to general healthcare treatment. Despite this, recent policy efforts have focused on improving access to behavioral health treatment. Objectives: We measured the effects on outpatient treatment of depression of a change in mental health benefits for employees of a large U.S.-based corporation. Research Design: The benefit change involved 3 major elements: reduced copayments for mental health treatment, the implementation of a selective contracting network, and an effort to destigmatize mental illness. Claims data and a difference-in-differences methodology were used to examine how the benefit change affected outpatient treatment of depression. Subjects: Subjects consisted of 214,517 employee-years of data for individuals who were continuously enrolled for at least 1 full year at the intervention company and 96,365 employee-years in the control group. Measures: We measured initiation into treatment of depression and the number of outpatient therapy visits. Results: The benefit change was associated with a 26% increase in the probability of initiating depression treatment. Conditional on initiating treatment, patients in the intervention company received 1.2 additional (P < 0.001) outpatient mental health treatment visits relative to the control group. Conclusions: Our results suggest that the overall effect of the company's benefit change was to significantly increase the number of outpatient visits per episode of treatment conditional on treatment initiation.
KW - Elasticity of demand
KW - Employer-sponsored mental health benefits
KW - Outpatient therapy
KW - Stigma
KW - Treatment episode
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33645963172&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33645963172&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/01.mlr.0000204083.55544.f8
DO - 10.1097/01.mlr.0000204083.55544.f8
M3 - Article
C2 - 16565638
AN - SCOPUS:33645963172
SN - 0025-7079
VL - 44
SP - 366
EP - 372
JO - Medical Care
JF - Medical Care
IS - 4
ER -