TY - JOUR
T1 - Experience with an adverse drug reaction reporting program in a neurology specialty clinic
AU - Ryan, Melody
AU - Gora-Harper, Mary Lea
AU - Caldwell, Frank
PY - 2002
Y1 - 2002
N2 - Objective: To describe an adverse drug reaction (ADR) reporting program that was developed in a university-affiliated neurology specialty clinic. METHODS: Reportable ADRs were identified through 3 mechanisms: by clinicians through routine visits, by patients who were encouraged to follow up with the pharmacist in the clinic, and by the pharmacist who contacted high-risk patients. Patient demographics, the suspected drug(s), elements to define probability, and outcomes were documented, collated, and analyzed for trends and opportunities for continuous quality-improvement efforts. Information was shared with clinic administrators and clinicians. Serious ADRs were reported to the Food and Drug Administration. RESULTS: The experience during a 1-year period, during which 40 ADRs were reported, is described. Medications by frequency of report and types of reactions are reported. None of the ADRs required admission to the hospital. Pharmacy personnel reported the majority of ADRs (92.5%). CONCLUSIONS: This program is successfully incorporated within daily practice and is an integral part of quality-improvement efforts.
AB - Objective: To describe an adverse drug reaction (ADR) reporting program that was developed in a university-affiliated neurology specialty clinic. METHODS: Reportable ADRs were identified through 3 mechanisms: by clinicians through routine visits, by patients who were encouraged to follow up with the pharmacist in the clinic, and by the pharmacist who contacted high-risk patients. Patient demographics, the suspected drug(s), elements to define probability, and outcomes were documented, collated, and analyzed for trends and opportunities for continuous quality-improvement efforts. Information was shared with clinic administrators and clinicians. Serious ADRs were reported to the Food and Drug Administration. RESULTS: The experience during a 1-year period, during which 40 ADRs were reported, is described. Medications by frequency of report and types of reactions are reported. None of the ADRs required admission to the hospital. Pharmacy personnel reported the majority of ADRs (92.5%). CONCLUSIONS: This program is successfully incorporated within daily practice and is an integral part of quality-improvement efforts.
KW - Adverse drug reaction
KW - Ambulatory care
KW - Neurology
KW - Outcomes research
KW - Pharmacy practice
KW - Reporting system
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036161614&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036161614&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1345/aph.1Z430
DO - 10.1345/aph.1Z430
M3 - Article
C2 - 11847939
AN - SCOPUS:0036161614
SN - 1060-0280
VL - 36
SP - 231
EP - 235
JO - Annals of Pharmacotherapy
JF - Annals of Pharmacotherapy
IS - 2
ER -