Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Factors driving bumble bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Bombus) and butterfly (Lepidoptera: Rhopalocera) use of sheared shrubland and young forest communities of the western Great Lakes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

In the northern Great Lakes region, the creation and maintenance of early-successional woody communities as wildlife habitat have increasingly become a conservation priority.The extent to which insect pollinators use these systems remains largely anecdotal. In summer (June–August) of 2021, we surveyed 49 early-successional sites in the western Great Lakes region treated with either shrub-shearing or silviculture (young forest) for bumble bees, butterflies, and habitat components (i.e., structural vegetation and floral resources). Hierarchical distance models predicted pollinator densities (λ̂) to be, on average, λ̂ = 84 bumble bees/ha and λ̂ = 102 butterflies/ha. Although sheared shrubland and young forest communities supported comparable densities of bumble bees and butterflies, density was not equal across all sites. At the microhabitat scale, butterfly density and morphospecies richness were negatively associated with tall shrub cover and butterfly morphospecies richness (but not density) was driven by floral richness. Similarly, bumble bee density was positively associated with metrics of floral resources, underscoring the importance of blooming plants within these woody systems. Landscape covariates explained variation in butterfly density/richness but not bumble bee density. Ultimately, our results demonstrate that blooming plant abundance is an important driver of bumble bee and butterfly densities within these managed early-successional communities. Because early-successional woody communities are dynamic and their herbaceous openings are ephemeral, routine management would ensure that a variety of successional conditions exist on the landscape to meet the needs of bumble bees, butterflies, and potentially other insect pollinators.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1095-1107
Number of pages13
JournalEnvironmental Entomology
Volume52
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America. All rights reserved.

Funding

This project was primarily funded by the United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service “Conservation Effects Assessment Project” (CEAP) grant (# A-3A75-16-522). Additional funding was provided by Pennsylvania Wildlife for Everyone Foundation and Commonwealth of Pennsylvania University Biologists. This project was primarily funded by the United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service “Conservation Effects Assessment Project” (CEAP) grant (# A-3A75-16-522). Additional funding was provided by Pennsylvania Wildlife for Everyone Foundation and Commonwealth of Pennsylvania University Biologists. The Minnesota Outdoor Heritage Fund supported habitat management efforts on public sites in Minnesota. We are grateful to Eric Bastidas, Claire Ratcliff, and Spencer Henkel for collecting field data. We thank Cloquet Area Forest, Carlton, Aikin, Douglas, and Saint Louis counties for providing us access to these public places. We are especially thankful to NRCS and ABC staff for helping us coordinate access to study sites, especially Kevin Sheppard, Callie Bertsch, and Patrick Weber. Lastly, we are greatly appreciative of the private landowners who provided us with access to their property.

FundersFunder number
Cloquet Area Forest
Minnesota Outdoor Heritage Fund
Pennsylvania University Biologists
8th Floor Saint Louis
Natural Resources Conservation ServiceA-3A75-16-522

    Keywords

    • bumble bee
    • butterfly
    • shrub-shearing
    • timber harvest
    • woody community

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
    • Ecology
    • Insect Science

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Factors driving bumble bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Bombus) and butterfly (Lepidoptera: Rhopalocera) use of sheared shrubland and young forest communities of the western Great Lakes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this