TY - JOUR
T1 - Factors influencing condylar position after the bilateral sagittal split osteotomy fixed with bicortical screws
AU - Harris, Michael D.
AU - Van Sickels, Joseph E.
AU - Alder, Marden
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 1999/6
Y1 - 1999/6
N2 - Purpose: Multiple articles have discussed condylar position after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO). However, previous studies have been limited to two-dimensional evaluation of condylar position. The purpose of this study was to evaluate change in condylar position after a BSSO fixed with bicortical screws using three-dimensional computed tomography to assess the factors that may influence the ultimate position of the condyle after surgery. Patients and Methods: Seventeen patients underwent isolated mandibular advancement involving a BSSO with rigid fixation. Reformated axial computed tomography was done 1 week before and 8 weeks after surgery. Movements evaluated included 1) medial-lateral, 2) superior-inferior, 3) anterior-posterior, and 4) condylar angulation. Three separate factors were analyzed to study their effects on the four movements noted: 1) amount of mandibular advancement, 2) amount of proximal segment rotation, and 3) preoperative shape of the mandible. A linear regression analysis was used with statistical significance set at P < .05. Results: Eight weeks after a BSSO and mandibular advancement, most cases showed displacement of the condyle medially, posteriorly, superiorly, and angled medially. The amount of mandibular advancement did not correlate with medial-lateral change of the condyle. The amount of advancement correlated with the condyle angulation and superior-inferior changes in condyle position. There was no correlation between amount of advancement and medial or anterior-posterior change in condyle position. There also was no correlation between any of the condylar movements and the degree of proximal segment rotation or the shape of the mandible. Conclusions: There are obvious changes in condyle position after a BSSO. These changes appear to be influenced mainly by factors other than amount of advancement, degree of proximal segment rotation, and shape of the mandible.
AB - Purpose: Multiple articles have discussed condylar position after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO). However, previous studies have been limited to two-dimensional evaluation of condylar position. The purpose of this study was to evaluate change in condylar position after a BSSO fixed with bicortical screws using three-dimensional computed tomography to assess the factors that may influence the ultimate position of the condyle after surgery. Patients and Methods: Seventeen patients underwent isolated mandibular advancement involving a BSSO with rigid fixation. Reformated axial computed tomography was done 1 week before and 8 weeks after surgery. Movements evaluated included 1) medial-lateral, 2) superior-inferior, 3) anterior-posterior, and 4) condylar angulation. Three separate factors were analyzed to study their effects on the four movements noted: 1) amount of mandibular advancement, 2) amount of proximal segment rotation, and 3) preoperative shape of the mandible. A linear regression analysis was used with statistical significance set at P < .05. Results: Eight weeks after a BSSO and mandibular advancement, most cases showed displacement of the condyle medially, posteriorly, superiorly, and angled medially. The amount of mandibular advancement did not correlate with medial-lateral change of the condyle. The amount of advancement correlated with the condyle angulation and superior-inferior changes in condyle position. There was no correlation between amount of advancement and medial or anterior-posterior change in condyle position. There also was no correlation between any of the condylar movements and the degree of proximal segment rotation or the shape of the mandible. Conclusions: There are obvious changes in condyle position after a BSSO. These changes appear to be influenced mainly by factors other than amount of advancement, degree of proximal segment rotation, and shape of the mandible.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033037167&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033037167&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0278-2391(99)90422-6
DO - 10.1016/S0278-2391(99)90422-6
M3 - Article
C2 - 10368087
AN - SCOPUS:0033037167
SN - 0278-2391
VL - 57
SP - 650
EP - 654
JO - Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
JF - Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
IS - 6
ER -