Fear appeals, message processing cues, and credibility in the websites of violent, ideological, and nonideological groups

Norah E. Dunbar, Shane Connelly, Matthew L. Jensen, Bradley J. Adame, Bobby Rozzell, Jennifer A. Griffith, H. Dan O'Hair

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

20 Scopus citations

Abstract

Ideological groups use the Internet to deliver their messages unhindered by the constraints of traditional media. We examined how ideological groups promote their worldview through their websites. Using the elaboration likelihood model (ELM), this research used trained coders to examine the websites of nonideological groups (n = 37), nonviolent ideological groups (n = 36), and violent ideological groups (n = 32) for credibility, persuasion processing cues, and interactivity factors. Results of this study found that the websites of violent ideological groups use more fear appeals, were less interactive, and were the least credible of the 3 groups. All 3 groups used more central cues than peripheral suggesting they focused on evidence for their arguments rather than emotion.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)871-889
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Computer-Mediated Communication
Volume19
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2014

Funding

FundersFunder number
National Science Foundation (NSF)1116653

    Keywords

    • Credibility
    • Group Dynamics
    • Ideology
    • Internet
    • Persuasion
    • Violence
    • Websites

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Computer Science Applications
    • Computer Networks and Communications

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Fear appeals, message processing cues, and credibility in the websites of violent, ideological, and nonideological groups'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this