Abstract
The effect of the direct reduction of cobalt nitrate versus the more conventional calcination/reduction treatment has been investigated. Porosity properties of the catalysts are not significantly modified by avoiding the calcination step, as similar BET surface area, pore volume and pore diameter are obtained for the activated catalysts. In contrast, the cobalt reducibility decreases, but smaller cobalt particles size and higher dispersion are obtained. The reduction phenomena occurring for the uncalcined catalysts are more complex because of the additional nitrate decomposition steps. TPR-MS and TPR-XANES point out that CoOx intermediate species are formed during the reductive nitrate decomposition. However, these species are oxidized by NOX (formed by nitrate decomposition) to spinel type Co3O4, which is then converted to CoO prior to the final reduction step to Co0. The addition of promoters (Pt, Re, Ru, Ag) improves the cobalt reducibility, especially by shifting the final reduction step (i.e., CoO to Co0) to lower temperature. FT activity testing data show that activated uncalcined catalysts have higher CO conversion following the initial decline and leveling off period relative to the activated calcined catalyst. The best performance is achieved with uncalcined Pt-12%Co/TiO2. This catalyst has the highest CO steady state conversion, which is 1.2 times higher than the Pt-promoted calcined catalyst. Moreover, its deactivation rate is 0.13%/h compared to 0.2%/h for the corresponding calcined catalyst. The difference in the catalytic activity is even higher for the un-promoted samples, where the activated uncalcined catalyst has almost double the CO conversion as compared to its calcined counterpart. Finally, the addition of other promoters such as Ru, Re and Ag has no significant effect on catalytic activity.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 488-504 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | Fuel |
| Volume | 245 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jun 1 2019 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2019 Elsevier Ltd
Funding
Research conducted at UTSA was supported by UTSA, the State of Texas, and the STARs program. The work carried out at the CAER was supported in part by funding from the Commonwealth of Kentucky. Argonne's research was supported in part by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL). Advanced Photon Source was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357. MRCAT operations are supported by the Department of Energy and the MRCAT member institutions. Research conducted at UTSA was supported by UTSA, the State of Texas, and the STARs program. The work carried out at the CAER was supported in part by funding from the Commonwealth of Kentucky. Argonne’s research was supported in part by the U.S. Department of Energy ( DOE ), Office of Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory ( NETL ). Advanced Photon Source was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357. MRCAT operations are supported by the Department of Energy and the MRCAT member institutions.
| Funders | Funder number |
|---|---|
| COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY | |
| Southwest Texas State University | |
| U.S. Department of Energy EPSCoR | |
| Office of Fossil Energy and Carbon Management | |
| Office of Science Programs | |
| DOE Basic Energy Sciences | DE-AC02-06CH11357 |
| The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio | |
| National Energy Technology Laboratory | |
| University of Kentucky Center for Applied Energy Research |
Keywords
- Cobalt
- Direct cobalt nitrate reduction
- Fischer-Tropsch synthesis
- Platinum
- Promoters
- Titania
- TPR-EXAFS
- TPR-MS
- TPR-XANES
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Chemical Engineering
- Fuel Technology
- Energy Engineering and Power Technology
- Organic Chemistry