Abstract
Objectives: In the Fluid and Catheter Treatment Trial (FACTT) of the National Institutes of Health Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network, a conservative fluid protocol (FACTT Conservative) resulted in a lower cumulative fluid balance and better outcomes than a liberal fluid protocol (FACTT Liberal). Subsequent Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network studies used a simplified conservative fluid protocol (FACTT Lite). The objective of this study was to compare the performance of FACTT Lite, FACTT Conservative, and FACTT Liberal protocols.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 288-295 |
Number of pages | 8 |
Journal | Critical Care Medicine |
Volume | 43 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Feb 1 2015 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2015 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Funding
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
American Society of Nephrology | |
American Thoracic Society | |
Intermountain Healthcare | |
National Institutes of Health (NIH) | HHSN268200536171C |
National Institute of General Medical Sciences | K23GM094465 |
National Institute of General Medical Sciences |
Keywords
- Acute kidney injury
- Adult respiratory distress syndrome
- Clinical protocols
- Critical illness
- Fluid therapy
- Shock
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine