TY - JOUR
T1 - Fourteen-Year Fluvial Sediment Record Shows Non-Conservativeness of Organic Tracers
T2 - Recommendations for Sediment Fingerprinting
AU - Riddle, Brenden
AU - Fox, Jimmy
AU - Ford, Bill
AU - Husic, Admin
AU - Pollock, Erik
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2025/1
Y1 - 2025/1
N2 - While tracing the sources of fluvial sediment using carbon and nitrogen stable isotopic ratios (δ13C and δ15N) has progressed significantly over the last two decades, the conservativeness of these tracers remains questionable. Recent work indicates that δ13C and δ15N alterations in streambed deposition zones likely represent the largest source of uncertainty impacting usefulness of the isotopic ratios as tracers. Here we report a 14-year dataset of δ13C and δ15N of fluvial sediment from a streambed-dominated basin in Kentucky, USA, and employ empirical model decomposition (EMD) to identify dominant temporal trends that may impact conservativeness. Results from EMD show significant seasonality of δ13C and δ15N for sediment as well as underlying multi-year variation. The seasonal and multi-year variance account for 72% and 50% of the total data variation for δ13C and δ15N, respectively. The prominent seasonality for δ13C and δ15N show a mean intra-annual change of 0.6‰ and 1.1‰, respectively, and the seasonal change is attributed to algal accrual and organic matter turnover in the streambed sediment deposits. Mixing model simulations show that the mean streambed isotopic ratios should be separated from other sediment sources by 3.0‰ and 3.6‰ for δ13C and δ15N, respectively, to achieve 90% accuracy in source apportionment when the isotopic ratios are used independently; and the mean streambed value of both isotopic ratios should be separated from other sediment sources by 3.0‰ when δ13C and δ15N are used in combination. Our results lead to the recommendation that isotope ratios of sources be separated by at least 3‰ when the streambed is expected to be a prominent sediment source, which far exceeds the prior recommendation of 1‰ mean separation of sources.
AB - While tracing the sources of fluvial sediment using carbon and nitrogen stable isotopic ratios (δ13C and δ15N) has progressed significantly over the last two decades, the conservativeness of these tracers remains questionable. Recent work indicates that δ13C and δ15N alterations in streambed deposition zones likely represent the largest source of uncertainty impacting usefulness of the isotopic ratios as tracers. Here we report a 14-year dataset of δ13C and δ15N of fluvial sediment from a streambed-dominated basin in Kentucky, USA, and employ empirical model decomposition (EMD) to identify dominant temporal trends that may impact conservativeness. Results from EMD show significant seasonality of δ13C and δ15N for sediment as well as underlying multi-year variation. The seasonal and multi-year variance account for 72% and 50% of the total data variation for δ13C and δ15N, respectively. The prominent seasonality for δ13C and δ15N show a mean intra-annual change of 0.6‰ and 1.1‰, respectively, and the seasonal change is attributed to algal accrual and organic matter turnover in the streambed sediment deposits. Mixing model simulations show that the mean streambed isotopic ratios should be separated from other sediment sources by 3.0‰ and 3.6‰ for δ13C and δ15N, respectively, to achieve 90% accuracy in source apportionment when the isotopic ratios are used independently; and the mean streambed value of both isotopic ratios should be separated from other sediment sources by 3.0‰ when δ13C and δ15N are used in combination. Our results lead to the recommendation that isotope ratios of sources be separated by at least 3‰ when the streambed is expected to be a prominent sediment source, which far exceeds the prior recommendation of 1‰ mean separation of sources.
KW - carbon
KW - erosion
KW - isotopic ratio
KW - nitrogen
KW - sediment sources
KW - sediment tracing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85215265755&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85215265755&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/hyp.70054
DO - 10.1002/hyp.70054
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85215265755
SN - 0885-6087
VL - 39
JO - Hydrological Processes
JF - Hydrological Processes
IS - 1
M1 - e70054
ER -