From the field: Field searches versus vaginal implant transmitters for locating elk calves

Nathan W. Seward, David S. Maehr, Jonathan W. Gassett, John J. Cox, Jeffery L. Larkin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

14 Scopus citations

Abstract

We compared the utility of vaginal implant transmitters (VITs) and field searches for locating elk (Cervus elaphus) calves in southeastern Kentucky during the spring of 2001. Retention of VITs among 40 adult females ranged from 1-276 days (x-=61.6±8.4 [SE] days). Approximately half of the transmitters (n = 19) were expelled prematurely or malfunctioned. Two of 37 (5%) transmitters in translocated females performed as designed and led to calf capture. We captured more calves (n = 9 in 2001; n = 16 in 2002) by searching areas where elk exhibited parturition behavior. We suggest that manufacturers refine the current VIT design to increase its application and cost-effectiveness.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)751-755
Number of pages5
JournalWildlife Society Bulletin
Volume33
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2005

Keywords

  • Cervus elaphus
  • Elk
  • Neonate
  • Parturition
  • Radiotelemetry
  • Translocation
  • Vaginal implant transmitter

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nature and Landscape Conservation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'From the field: Field searches versus vaginal implant transmitters for locating elk calves'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this