TY - JOUR
T1 - Generative AI and College Students
T2 - Use and Perceptions
AU - Golding, Jonathan M.
AU - Lippert, Anne
AU - Neuschatz, Jeffrey S.
AU - Salomon, Ilyssa
AU - Burke, Kelly
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2024.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Background: The advent of generative-artificial intelligence (AI) applications introduces new challenges for colleges. Importantly, the growth of these applications requires faculty to adjust their pedagogy to account for the changing technological landscape. Objective: As colleges wrestle with the implications of these applications, it is important to understand college students’ perceptions and use of generative-AI. Method: Undergraduate college students’ (in psychology courses) were surveyed about their use and perception of these applications. The sample was from five U.S. universities; primarily made up of women, and included White, Hispanic, and Black participants. Results: Most students were familiar with these applications, yet less than half had used them in college, primarily to receive help with assignments. Those not using these applications gave “getting caught” and “cheating” as responses for not using them. Finally, most students perceived using these applications as cheating. Conclusions: Students were familiar with these applications and were most likely to use them in humanities courses. Furthermore, these applications were used most often in writing tasks. Teaching Implications: The increased use of these applications has led to educators debating whether these applications should be incorporated into the college classroom.
AB - Background: The advent of generative-artificial intelligence (AI) applications introduces new challenges for colleges. Importantly, the growth of these applications requires faculty to adjust their pedagogy to account for the changing technological landscape. Objective: As colleges wrestle with the implications of these applications, it is important to understand college students’ perceptions and use of generative-AI. Method: Undergraduate college students’ (in psychology courses) were surveyed about their use and perception of these applications. The sample was from five U.S. universities; primarily made up of women, and included White, Hispanic, and Black participants. Results: Most students were familiar with these applications, yet less than half had used them in college, primarily to receive help with assignments. Those not using these applications gave “getting caught” and “cheating” as responses for not using them. Finally, most students perceived using these applications as cheating. Conclusions: Students were familiar with these applications and were most likely to use them in humanities courses. Furthermore, these applications were used most often in writing tasks. Teaching Implications: The increased use of these applications has led to educators debating whether these applications should be incorporated into the college classroom.
KW - academic dis/honesty
KW - artificial intelligence
KW - ChatGPT
KW - cheating
KW - college
KW - education
KW - generative-AI
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85205288668&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85205288668&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/00986283241280350
DO - 10.1177/00986283241280350
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85205288668
SN - 0098-6283
JO - Teaching of Psychology
JF - Teaching of Psychology
ER -