TY - JOUR
T1 - Growth of the Digital Footprint of the Society of Critical Care Medicine Annual Congress
T2 - 2014-2020
AU - Carroll, Christopher L.
AU - Szakmany, Tamas
AU - Dangayach, Neha S.
AU - Depriest, Ashley
AU - Duprey, Matthew S.
AU - Kaul, Viren
AU - Kleinpell, Ruth
AU - Tegtmeyer, Ken
AU - Kudchadkar, Sapna R.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Authors. All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/11/12
Y1 - 2020/11/12
N2 - Objectives: Since 2014, the Society of Critical Care Medicine has encouraged "live-Tweeting" through the use of specific hashtags at each annual Critical Care Congress. We describe how the digital footprint of the Society of Critical Care Medicine Congress on Twitter has evolved at a time when social media use at conferences is becoming increasingly popular. Design: We used Symplur Signals (Symplur LLC, Pasadena, CA) to track all tweets containing the Society of Critical Care Medicine Congress hashtag for each annual meeting between 2014 and 2020. We collected data on the number of tweets, tweet characteristics, and impressions (i.e., potential views) for each year and data on the characteristics of the top 100 most actively tweeting users of that Congress. Setting: Twitter. Subjects: Users tweeting with the Critical Care Congress hashtag. Interventions: Not applicable. Measurements and Main Results: The Critical Care Congress digital footprint grew substantially from 2014 to 2020. The 2014 Critical Care Congress included 1,629 tweets by 266 users, compared with 29,657 tweets by 3,551 participants in 2020; average hourly tweets increased from 9.7 to 177. The percentage of tweets with mentions of other users and tweets with visual media increased. Users attending the conference were significantly more likely to compose original tweets, whereas those tweeting from afar were more likely to retweet Critical Care Congress content. There was a yearly increase in content-specific hashtags used in conjunction with Critical Care Congress hashtags (n = 429 in 2014 to n = 22,272 in 2020), most commonly related to pediatrics (18% of all hashtags), mobility/rehab (9%), sepsis (7%) social media (6%), and ICU burnout (1%). Conclusions: There has been significant growth in live-Tweeting at the Critical Care Congress, along with the increased use of content-specific hashtags and visual media. This digital footprint is largely driven by a proportion of highly engaged users. As medical conferences transition to completely or partially online platforms, understanding of the digital footprint is crucial for success.
AB - Objectives: Since 2014, the Society of Critical Care Medicine has encouraged "live-Tweeting" through the use of specific hashtags at each annual Critical Care Congress. We describe how the digital footprint of the Society of Critical Care Medicine Congress on Twitter has evolved at a time when social media use at conferences is becoming increasingly popular. Design: We used Symplur Signals (Symplur LLC, Pasadena, CA) to track all tweets containing the Society of Critical Care Medicine Congress hashtag for each annual meeting between 2014 and 2020. We collected data on the number of tweets, tweet characteristics, and impressions (i.e., potential views) for each year and data on the characteristics of the top 100 most actively tweeting users of that Congress. Setting: Twitter. Subjects: Users tweeting with the Critical Care Congress hashtag. Interventions: Not applicable. Measurements and Main Results: The Critical Care Congress digital footprint grew substantially from 2014 to 2020. The 2014 Critical Care Congress included 1,629 tweets by 266 users, compared with 29,657 tweets by 3,551 participants in 2020; average hourly tweets increased from 9.7 to 177. The percentage of tweets with mentions of other users and tweets with visual media increased. Users attending the conference were significantly more likely to compose original tweets, whereas those tweeting from afar were more likely to retweet Critical Care Congress content. There was a yearly increase in content-specific hashtags used in conjunction with Critical Care Congress hashtags (n = 429 in 2014 to n = 22,272 in 2020), most commonly related to pediatrics (18% of all hashtags), mobility/rehab (9%), sepsis (7%) social media (6%), and ICU burnout (1%). Conclusions: There has been significant growth in live-Tweeting at the Critical Care Congress, along with the increased use of content-specific hashtags and visual media. This digital footprint is largely driven by a proportion of highly engaged users. As medical conferences transition to completely or partially online platforms, understanding of the digital footprint is crucial for success.
KW - conference social media
KW - digital health
KW - healthcare communication
KW - patient-centered care
KW - social media
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85144882887&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85144882887&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000252
DO - 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000252
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85144882887
SN - 2639-8028
VL - 2
SP - E0252
JO - Critical Care Explorations
JF - Critical Care Explorations
IS - 11
ER -