Guilty until proven guilty? An examination of the anti-piracy response at the interactional level

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

The focus of literature on the policy responses to the Somali pirate has thus far examined controls put in place at the international, regional, and national levels. There has however, been little research examining how these international level policies have manifested themselves at the interactional level, namely through the prosecution of individuals charged with the crime of piracy. Here, informed by elements of critical race theory and the politics of identity, I analyze the trial transcripts of the prosecution of five Somali nationals in the US. I pay particular attention to the reality of these anti-piracy policies as they play out in a US courtroom where they not only reify larger processes of global stratification, but also deny the defendant's access to justice by characterizing them as black, Muslim, youth with possible connections to terrorism.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)88-108
Number of pages21
JournalInternational Journal of Law, Crime and Justice
Volume43
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2015

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 Elsevier Ltd.

Keywords

  • Critical race theory
  • Justice
  • Maritime piracy trials
  • Politics of identity
  • Somali piracy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Political Science and International Relations
  • Law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Guilty until proven guilty? An examination of the anti-piracy response at the interactional level'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this