TY - JOUR
T1 - High performance in risk stratification of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms by confocal laser endomicroscopy image analysis with convolutional neural networks (with video)
AU - Machicado, Jorge D.
AU - Chao, Wei Lun
AU - Carlyn, David E.
AU - Pan, Tai Yu
AU - Poland, Sarah
AU - Alexander, Victoria L.
AU - Maloof, Tassiana G.
AU - Dubay, Kelly
AU - Ueltschi, Olivia
AU - Middendorf, Dana M.
AU - Jajeh, Muhammed O.
AU - Vishwanath, Aadit B.
AU - Porter, Kyle
AU - Hart, Phil A.
AU - Papachristou, Georgios I.
AU - Cruz-Monserrate, Zobeida
AU - Conwell, Darwin L.
AU - Krishna, Somashekar G.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
PY - 2021/7
Y1 - 2021/7
N2 - Background and Aims: EUS-guided needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (EUS-nCLE) can differentiate high-grade dysplasia/adenocarcinoma (HGD-Ca) in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) but requires manual interpretation. We sought to derive predictive computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) and artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms to facilitate accurate diagnosis and risk stratification of IPMNs. Methods: A post hoc analysis of a single-center prospective study evaluating EUS-nCLE (2015-2019; INDEX study) was conducted using 15,027 video frames from 35 consecutive patients with histopathologically proven IPMNs (18 with HGD-Ca). We designed 2 CAD-convolutional neural network (CNN) algorithms: (1) a guided segmentation-based model (SBM), where the CNN-AI system was trained to detect and measure papillary epithelial thickness and darkness (indicative of cellular and nuclear stratification), and (2) a reasonably agnostic holistic-based model (HBM) where the CNN-AI system automatically extracted nCLE features for risk stratification. For the detection of HGD-Ca in IPMNs, the diagnostic performance of the CNN-CAD algorithms was compared with that of the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) and revised Fukuoka guidelines. Results: Compared with the guidelines, both n-CLE-guided CNN-CAD algorithms yielded higher sensitivity (HBM, 83.3%; SBM, 83.3%; AGA, 55.6%; Fukuoka, 55.6%) and accuracy (SBM, 82.9%; HBM, 85.7%; AGA, 68.6%; Fukuoka, 74.3%) for diagnosing HGD-Ca, with comparable specificity (SBM, 82.4%; HBM, 88.2%; AGA, 82.4%; Fukuoka, 94.1%). Both CNN-CAD algorithms, the guided (SBM) and agnostic (HBM) models, were comparable in risk stratifying IPMNs. Conclusion: EUS-nCLE-based CNN-CAD algorithms can accurately risk stratify IPMNs. Future multicenter validation studies and AI model improvements could enhance the accuracy and fully automatize the process for real-time interpretation.
AB - Background and Aims: EUS-guided needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (EUS-nCLE) can differentiate high-grade dysplasia/adenocarcinoma (HGD-Ca) in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) but requires manual interpretation. We sought to derive predictive computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) and artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms to facilitate accurate diagnosis and risk stratification of IPMNs. Methods: A post hoc analysis of a single-center prospective study evaluating EUS-nCLE (2015-2019; INDEX study) was conducted using 15,027 video frames from 35 consecutive patients with histopathologically proven IPMNs (18 with HGD-Ca). We designed 2 CAD-convolutional neural network (CNN) algorithms: (1) a guided segmentation-based model (SBM), where the CNN-AI system was trained to detect and measure papillary epithelial thickness and darkness (indicative of cellular and nuclear stratification), and (2) a reasonably agnostic holistic-based model (HBM) where the CNN-AI system automatically extracted nCLE features for risk stratification. For the detection of HGD-Ca in IPMNs, the diagnostic performance of the CNN-CAD algorithms was compared with that of the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) and revised Fukuoka guidelines. Results: Compared with the guidelines, both n-CLE-guided CNN-CAD algorithms yielded higher sensitivity (HBM, 83.3%; SBM, 83.3%; AGA, 55.6%; Fukuoka, 55.6%) and accuracy (SBM, 82.9%; HBM, 85.7%; AGA, 68.6%; Fukuoka, 74.3%) for diagnosing HGD-Ca, with comparable specificity (SBM, 82.4%; HBM, 88.2%; AGA, 82.4%; Fukuoka, 94.1%). Both CNN-CAD algorithms, the guided (SBM) and agnostic (HBM) models, were comparable in risk stratifying IPMNs. Conclusion: EUS-nCLE-based CNN-CAD algorithms can accurately risk stratify IPMNs. Future multicenter validation studies and AI model improvements could enhance the accuracy and fully automatize the process for real-time interpretation.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85101296525&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85101296525&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.gie.2020.12.054
DO - 10.1016/j.gie.2020.12.054
M3 - Article
C2 - 33465354
AN - SCOPUS:85101296525
SN - 0016-5107
VL - 94
SP - 78-87.e2
JO - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
JF - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
IS - 1
ER -