TY - JOUR
T1 - High-stakes information
T2 - Deciding what constitutes quality in our products of communication
AU - Budd, John M.
AU - Burns, C. Sean
AU - Moulaison, Heather Lea
PY - 2013
Y1 - 2013
N2 - As more information is digitized or born online, issues with assessment and preservation, in the forms of determining, reviewing, and describing it, increase. This is particularly true for what we might term high-stakes information, or information that if not carefully assessed or preserved can result in harmful consequences. With the premise that scholarly information is high-stakes information, the panel will take a tripartite approach to the consideration of what constitutes information quality in three distinct contexts: quality as an element of the research process, quality as a component of the scholarly communication process, and quality as a factor in the storage and long-term access of the product of research. The researchers on this panel will present reviews of the literature and their research findings. After the presentations, the panelists will raise a series of questions in order to foster discussion with the audience.
AB - As more information is digitized or born online, issues with assessment and preservation, in the forms of determining, reviewing, and describing it, increase. This is particularly true for what we might term high-stakes information, or information that if not carefully assessed or preserved can result in harmful consequences. With the premise that scholarly information is high-stakes information, the panel will take a tripartite approach to the consideration of what constitutes information quality in three distinct contexts: quality as an element of the research process, quality as a component of the scholarly communication process, and quality as a factor in the storage and long-term access of the product of research. The researchers on this panel will present reviews of the literature and their research findings. After the presentations, the panelists will raise a series of questions in order to foster discussion with the audience.
KW - Authority
KW - Metadata
KW - Peer review
KW - Publication
KW - Quality control
KW - Scholarly communication
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84903974161&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84903974161&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/meet.14505001020
DO - 10.1002/meet.14505001020
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84903974161
SN - 1550-8390
VL - 50
JO - Proceedings of the ASIST Annual Meeting
JF - Proceedings of the ASIST Annual Meeting
IS - 1
ER -