His, Hers, and Ours: Gendered Roles and Resources in Academic Departments

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

This article presents findings from an exploratory study of whether and how gender-based patterns were present in faculty members’ departmental networks. A network analysis approach was used to identify if women and men had ties to their departmental colleagues in similar patterns and for similar purposes. Findings from the analysis of network survey and interview data with 19 faculty members in two academic departments suggest that some participants held gendered expectations of collegial support and that perceptions of gender roles may have influenced departmental work and relationships. Gender was salient for women in ways that did not shape the experiences of men in the same departments. There was a tendency for participants to connect to colleagues who were women for teaching-related purposes more than for research purposes or other reasons. Faculty members’ relationships with their colleagues may be shaped by their own gender-based assumptions and behaviors as well as those of their colleagues. These differences across gender led to different networks of relationships for various functions of colleagueship, which participants used to obtain different resources that were important for their career success.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)109-129
Number of pages21
JournalNASPA Journal About Women in Higher Education
Volume11
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - May 4 2018

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
©, Copyright © NASPA.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gender Studies
  • Education

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'His, Hers, and Ours: Gendered Roles and Resources in Academic Departments'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this