Abstract
Historical control trials (HCTs) utilize retrospective data on a standard treatment, or observation alone, as a control. Indications for HCTs include disease states where no viable therapeutic alternative exists, and randomizing patients to observation or minimally effective therapy is unethical. While limitations arising from the inability to limiting confounders through randomization exist in HCTs, appropriate use of single-arm studies implementing historical controls has the advantage of treating all patients on trial with active therapy and spurring development and approval of novel therapies. In this chapter, we discuss the limitations of this trial approach, which can be effectively mitigated by carefully defining the disease space, limiting heterogeneity in patient and disease characteristics, and choosing clinically meaningful and reproducible endpoints. We apply these principles to a real-world example in urologic oncology, the BCG-unresponsive nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer space.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Translational Urology |
Subtitle of host publication | Handbook for Designing and Conducting Clinical and Translational Research |
Pages | 211-215 |
Number of pages | 5 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 9780323901864 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jan 1 2024 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2025 Elsevier Inc. All rights are reserved including those for text and data mining AI training and similar technologies.
Keywords
- BCG unresponsive
- Clinical trial
- Historical control
- Nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer
- Single arm
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
- General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology