Abstract
Despite how ubiquitous it is in daily life, there has been little criminological theory developed which accounts for the unique conditions of cyberspace, and how the online environment informs or shapes deviant behavior. Building on Goldsmith and Brewer’s digital drift theory, this article proposes the Canute paradox, which contends that despite our expectations that online platforms have great power to act against cyberdeviance and choose not to, the reality is that—for all their power—there is little that can be done to comprehensively combat online harms. It is argued that the strong pull of online deviance comes from various environmental factors that converge online, creating significant barriers to effective responses. It does not argue against responding to cyberdeviance, but rather highlights the scale of the issue, and the need for collaborative whole-system responses rather than reliance on industry-centric solutions alone.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 17488958251382055 |
| Journal | Criminology and Criminal Justice |
| DOIs | |
| State | Accepted/In press - 2025 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© The Author(s) 2025
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Content moderation
- cybercrime
- cyberdeviance
- digital drift
- online harms
- regulation
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Law
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Holding back the tides? Applying the Canute paradox to the regulation of cyberdeviance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver