Abstract
Purpose: This study compared differences in sociodemographic characteristics, personal risk perception of lung cancer, lung cancer worry, and synergistic risk perception among rural Appalachia residents who completed home radon testing with those who did not, after receiving a free long-term test kit at a rural primary care clinic. The study also examined the association between the Teachable Moment Model constructs and home radon testing. Methods: The study was an exploratory correlational design with a convenience sample of (N = 58) adult participants recruited from 2 rural primary care clinics in Appalachia Kentucky. Participants completed a brief survey and were given a free long-term home radon test kit. Multiple logistic regression was used to determine characteristics associated with home radon testing. Findings: Twenty-eight participants (48%) completed home radon testing. There were no differences in personal risk perception of lung cancer, lung cancer worry, or synergistic risk perception between those who completed home radon testing and those who did not. Age was the only significant factor associated with completion of radon testing (B = 0.077, P =.005). For every 5-year increase in age, participants were 47% more likely to test their home for radon. Conclusion: Providing free home radon test kits in the primary care setting shows promise in prompting radon testing in rural Appalachia. As radon-induced lung cancer risk increases with exposure over time, health care providers in rural Appalachia need to encourage patients of all ages to test their home for radon, especially those who smoke or report smoking in the home.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 251-261 |
Number of pages | 11 |
Journal | Journal of Rural Health |
Volume | 38 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jan 1 2022 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:: This publication was supported, in part, by UK‐CARES through Grant P30 ES026529. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. Funding
Funding Information:
The authors would like to thank St. Claire HealthCare and the Northeast Area Health Education Center for partnering on this project. This publication was supported, in part, by UK-CARES through Grant P30 ES026529. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 National Rural Health Association
Funding
: This publication was supported, in part, by UK‐CARES through Grant P30 ES026529. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. Funding The authors would like to thank St. Claire HealthCare and the Northeast Area Health Education Center for partnering on this project. This publication was supported, in part, by UK-CARES through Grant P30 ES026529. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences.
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
Northeast Kentucky Area Health Education Center | |
St. Claire HealthCare | |
UK-CARES | |
UK-CARES | P30 ES026529 |
National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences | P30ES026529 |
National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health