How to undertake ideologically contentious research: Leaning on reflexivity and positionality to address uncomfortable disjuncture's in information research

Shannon M. Oltmann; Sarah Barriage; Devon Greyson; Matthew Vaughn

doi:10.1002/pra2.282

How to undertake ideologically contentious research: Leaning on reflexivity and positionality to address uncomfortable disjuncture's in information research

Shannon M. Oltmann, Sarah Barriage, Devon Greyson, Matthew Vaughn

School of Information Science

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

In this 40-minute panel, four researchers who study contentious issues will discuss those topics and address how they navigate ideological disagreements with their research participants. Reflexivity and positionality are two analytical tools that are useful in this process of unpacking research. We describe these concepts and position our own research within these spaces.

Original language	English
Article number	e282
Journal	Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology
Volume	57
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.282
State	Published - 2020

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
83rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Information Science & Technology October 25-29, 2020. Author(s) retain copyright, but ASIS&T receives an exclusive publication license.

Keywords

ideology
methods
positionality
qualitative
reflexivity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

General Computer Science
Library and Information Sciences

Access to Document

10.1002/pra2.282

Cite this

@article{1a28a23e25d1499dbf87387ab480cec7,

title = "How to undertake ideologically contentious research: Leaning on reflexivity and positionality to address uncomfortable disjuncture's in information research",

abstract = "In this 40-minute panel, four researchers who study contentious issues will discuss those topics and address how they navigate ideological disagreements with their research participants. Reflexivity and positionality are two analytical tools that are useful in this process of unpacking research. We describe these concepts and position our own research within these spaces.",

keywords = "ideology, methods, positionality, qualitative, reflexivity",

author = "Oltmann, {Shannon M.} and Sarah Barriage and Devon Greyson and Matthew Vaughn",

note = "Publisher Copyright: 83rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Information Science & Technology October 25-29, 2020. Author(s) retain copyright, but ASIS&T receives an exclusive publication license.",

year = "2020",

doi = "10.1002/pra2.282",

language = "English",

volume = "57",

number = "1",

}

How to undertake ideologically contentious research: Leaning on reflexivity and positionality to address uncomfortable disjuncture's in information research. / Oltmann, Shannon M.; Barriage, Sarah; Greyson, Devon et al.
In: Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 57, No. 1, e282, 2020.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - How to undertake ideologically contentious research

T2 - Leaning on reflexivity and positionality to address uncomfortable disjuncture's in information research

AU - Oltmann, Shannon M.

AU - Barriage, Sarah

AU - Greyson, Devon

AU - Vaughn, Matthew

N1 - Publisher Copyright: 83rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Information Science & Technology October 25-29, 2020. Author(s) retain copyright, but ASIS&T receives an exclusive publication license.

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - In this 40-minute panel, four researchers who study contentious issues will discuss those topics and address how they navigate ideological disagreements with their research participants. Reflexivity and positionality are two analytical tools that are useful in this process of unpacking research. We describe these concepts and position our own research within these spaces.

AB - In this 40-minute panel, four researchers who study contentious issues will discuss those topics and address how they navigate ideological disagreements with their research participants. Reflexivity and positionality are two analytical tools that are useful in this process of unpacking research. We describe these concepts and position our own research within these spaces.

KW - ideology

KW - methods

KW - positionality

KW - qualitative

KW - reflexivity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85140066333&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85140066333&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/pra2.282

DO - 10.1002/pra2.282

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85140066333

VL - 57

JO - Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology

JF - Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology

IS - 1

M1 - e282

ER -

How to undertake ideologically contentious research: Leaning on reflexivity and positionality to address uncomfortable disjuncture's in information research

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this