TY - JOUR
T1 - How we teach
T2 - Kinetics and reactor design
AU - Silverstein, David L.
AU - Vigeant, Margot A.
PY - 2011
Y1 - 2011
N2 - This paper presents the results of the 2010 AIChE Education Division survey on how chemical engineering courses are taught. This year's survey focuses on the undergraduate reactor design and kinetics course. The survey was conducted of faculty recently teaching the course at their institution during the 2009-2010 academic year in the United States and Canada. The report consists of two parts: the statistical and demographic characterization of the course and its content; and the remainder seeks to bring out the most innovative and effective approaches to teaching the course in use by instructors. Additionally, a historical comparison is made between the current survey results and surveys on the same course conducted in 1974, 1984, and 1991.
AB - This paper presents the results of the 2010 AIChE Education Division survey on how chemical engineering courses are taught. This year's survey focuses on the undergraduate reactor design and kinetics course. The survey was conducted of faculty recently teaching the course at their institution during the 2009-2010 academic year in the United States and Canada. The report consists of two parts: the statistical and demographic characterization of the course and its content; and the remainder seeks to bring out the most innovative and effective approaches to teaching the course in use by instructors. Additionally, a historical comparison is made between the current survey results and surveys on the same course conducted in 1974, 1984, and 1991.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85029099955&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85029099955&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85029099955
JO - ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings
JF - ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings
ER -