“I Need to Do Better”: The Promotion of Undergraduate Women's STEM Identity by Engineering Faculty

Elizabeth Peterson, Emily Kulakowski, Sylvia L. Mendez

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

The purpose of this intrinsic case study was to explore the conceptual knowledge of engineering faculty regarding STEM identity and how they promote undergraduate women's STEM identity in the classroom. Interviews with faculty were grounded in Collins’ contextual model of Black student STEM identity and were analyzed inductively and deductively. Three themes emerged: (1) faculty are aware of STEM identity but cannot define it; (2) faculty passively promotes STEM identity in the classroom; and (3) faculty actively promote STEM identity through research, service, and mentorship. These findings shed light on the general commitment of engineering faculty to broaden and diversify participation in their field as well as the need for a greater understanding of the role faculty can play in stimulating the STEM identity of undergraduate women in the classroom, efforts that may translate into more women earning baccalaureate degrees in engineering.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)461-481
Number of pages21
JournalJournal of Advanced Academics
Volume35
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2024.

Keywords

  • engineering faculty
  • STEM identity
  • undergraduate women

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '“I Need to Do Better”: The Promotion of Undergraduate Women's STEM Identity by Engineering Faculty'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this