TY - JOUR
T1 - Identifying Guideline-Practice Gaps to Optimize Evaluation and Management for Patients With Syncope
AU - Smyth, Susan
AU - Gupta, Vedant
AU - Williams, Mark
AU - Cowley, Amy
AU - Sirrine, Matthew
AU - Surratt, Hilary
AU - Chadha, Romil
AU - Stearley, Seth
AU - Bhalla, Vikas
AU - Li, Jing
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Canadian Cardiovascular Society
PY - 2021/3
Y1 - 2021/3
N2 - Syncope is a common and complex symptom that requires efficient evaluation to determine the cause. Recent guidelines focus on high-value testing, but a systematic evaluation of their implementation has not been performed. To this end, we used a mixed-methods approach of surveys, chart reviews, and focus groups to understand current practices relating to the diagnosis and management of patients with syncope and to identify barriers and facilitators to the implementation of guideline-supported recommendations. Surveys were distributed to 1500 providers in the specialties of hospital medicine, cardiology, emergency medicine, and family medicine, and 175 responses were received. Knowledge of class I and III guideline recommendations were assessed with the use of clinical vignettes, which were answered correctly 60%-80% of the time. Chart reviews focused on patient history and testing for syncope. Per the guidelines, < 50% of charts met criteria for bare minimum history and physical examination. Based on the documentation, 25% of echocardiograms and 90% of neurologic testing obtained would not have been appropriate per the guidelines. Self-reported and actual practice patterns were similar in rates of testing. Our results indicate that there remains a gap between guideline-directed management and actual practice for syncope. Focus groups revealed barriers across multiple levels of care that need to be addressed to improve care. Our findings emphasize the need for proactive strategies to improve syncope testing practices, potentially saving millions of dollars in the health care system.
AB - Syncope is a common and complex symptom that requires efficient evaluation to determine the cause. Recent guidelines focus on high-value testing, but a systematic evaluation of their implementation has not been performed. To this end, we used a mixed-methods approach of surveys, chart reviews, and focus groups to understand current practices relating to the diagnosis and management of patients with syncope and to identify barriers and facilitators to the implementation of guideline-supported recommendations. Surveys were distributed to 1500 providers in the specialties of hospital medicine, cardiology, emergency medicine, and family medicine, and 175 responses were received. Knowledge of class I and III guideline recommendations were assessed with the use of clinical vignettes, which were answered correctly 60%-80% of the time. Chart reviews focused on patient history and testing for syncope. Per the guidelines, < 50% of charts met criteria for bare minimum history and physical examination. Based on the documentation, 25% of echocardiograms and 90% of neurologic testing obtained would not have been appropriate per the guidelines. Self-reported and actual practice patterns were similar in rates of testing. Our results indicate that there remains a gap between guideline-directed management and actual practice for syncope. Focus groups revealed barriers across multiple levels of care that need to be addressed to improve care. Our findings emphasize the need for proactive strategies to improve syncope testing practices, potentially saving millions of dollars in the health care system.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85098658819&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85098658819&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cjca.2020.05.022
DO - 10.1016/j.cjca.2020.05.022
M3 - Article
C2 - 32447058
AN - SCOPUS:85098658819
SN - 0828-282X
VL - 37
SP - 500
EP - 503
JO - Canadian Journal of Cardiology
JF - Canadian Journal of Cardiology
IS - 3
ER -