TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of different methodologies on the estimation of antibiotic tissue penetration
T2 - Determination of cefmetazole penetration into bone and soft tissue
AU - Burgess, D. S.
AU - White, R. L.
AU - Friedman, R. J.
AU - Bosso, J. A.
PY - 1996
Y1 - 1996
N2 - The percent penetration and estimation of extracellular fluid concentration of cefmetazole in bone and soft tissue was determined in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. Simultaneous serum, soft tissue, and bone samples were obtained at regular intervals during surgery and analyzed for cefmetazole content by high performance liquid chromatography. Percent penetration was calculated based on the calculated free concentration and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC). Extracellular fluid concentrations were estimated by two methods, an equilibrium method assuming equal free (unbound) serum concentrations and free extracellular fluid concentration and a weight method based on approximate percentage of total tissue weight comprised by extracellular fluid. The AUC and percent penetration in bone calculated using a bone standard curve were significantly higher than by using a phosphate buffer standard curve (AUC p = 0.0012, % penetration p = 0.0001). The extracellular fluid concentration, estimated by either of the methods listed above, was significantly higher than the tissue homogenate for both soft tissue and bone (p = 0.0001). Therefore, if the distribution of antibiotic within the tissue is not taken into account, soft tissue and bone concentrations of cefmetazole would be under-estimated by 3- 5 fold. Investigators and clinicians need to be cognizant of these problems and avoid misinterpretation of tissue penetration studies.
AB - The percent penetration and estimation of extracellular fluid concentration of cefmetazole in bone and soft tissue was determined in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. Simultaneous serum, soft tissue, and bone samples were obtained at regular intervals during surgery and analyzed for cefmetazole content by high performance liquid chromatography. Percent penetration was calculated based on the calculated free concentration and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC). Extracellular fluid concentrations were estimated by two methods, an equilibrium method assuming equal free (unbound) serum concentrations and free extracellular fluid concentration and a weight method based on approximate percentage of total tissue weight comprised by extracellular fluid. The AUC and percent penetration in bone calculated using a bone standard curve were significantly higher than by using a phosphate buffer standard curve (AUC p = 0.0012, % penetration p = 0.0001). The extracellular fluid concentration, estimated by either of the methods listed above, was significantly higher than the tissue homogenate for both soft tissue and bone (p = 0.0001). Therefore, if the distribution of antibiotic within the tissue is not taken into account, soft tissue and bone concentrations of cefmetazole would be under-estimated by 3- 5 fold. Investigators and clinicians need to be cognizant of these problems and avoid misinterpretation of tissue penetration studies.
KW - Cefmetazole
KW - extracellular fluid
KW - pharmacodynamics
KW - tissue penetration
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029766878&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029766878&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1300/J100v02n01_02
DO - 10.1300/J100v02n01_02
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0029766878
SN - 1068-7777
VL - 2
SP - 15
EP - 28
JO - Journal of Infectious Disease Pharmacotherapy
JF - Journal of Infectious Disease Pharmacotherapy
IS - 1
ER -