Abstract
Introduction Findings for genetic correlates of late-onset Alzheimer's disease (LOAD) in studies that rely solely on clinic visits may differ from those with capacity to follow participants unable to attend clinic visits. Methods We evaluated previously identified LOAD-risk single nucleotide variants in the prospective Adult Changes in Thought study, comparing hazard ratios (HRs) estimated using the full data set of both in-home and clinic visits (n = 1697) to HRs estimated using only data that were obtained from clinic visits (n = 1308). Models were adjusted for age, sex, principal components to account for ancestry, and additional health indicators. Results LOAD associations nominally differed for 4 of 21 variants; CR1 and APOE variants were significant after Bonferroni correction. Discussion Estimates of genetic associations may differ for studies limited to clinic-only designs. Home visit capacity should be explored as a possible source of heterogeneity and potential bias in genetic studies.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 933-939 |
Number of pages | 7 |
Journal | Alzheimer's and Dementia |
Volume | 13 |
Issue number | 8 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Aug 2017 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2017 the Alzheimer's Association
Keywords
- Ascertainment bias
- Bias
- Cohort studies
- Genetics
- Genome-wide association studies
- Genome-wide studies
- Home research study visits
- Inference
- Late-onset Alzheimer's disease
- Longitudinal studies
- Missing data
- Population-based studies
- Prospective studies
- Research clinic study visits
- Selection bias
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Epidemiology
- Health Policy
- Developmental Neuroscience
- Clinical Neurology
- Geriatrics and Gerontology
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
- Psychiatry and Mental health