TY - JOUR
T1 - Implant Angulation Effect on the Fracture Resistance of Monolithic Zirconia Custom Abutments
T2 - An In Vitro Study
AU - Katsavochristou, Anastasia
AU - Sierraalta, Marianella
AU - Saglik, Berna
AU - Koumoulis, Dimitrios
AU - George, Furat
AU - Razzoog, Michael
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 by the American College of Prosthodontists
PY - 2020/6/1
Y1 - 2020/6/1
N2 - Purpose: To investigate the fracture resistance and performance of zirconia when employed for the fabrication of implant abutments with different angulations, simulating anterior maxillary oral rehabilitation. Materials and Methods: Forty-five monolithic zirconia custom abutments of internal conical implant connection were CAD/CAM designed and fabricated. The specimens were divided into three groups (n = 15/group) according to implant-to-abutment angulation. The angulations used were; 0°, 15°, and 25°. The abutments were loaded until failure at 135° using the Universal Testing Machine (Instron, Canton, MA). Collected data were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey test. Results: Mean (±standard deviation) load at fracture of the zirconia abutments for the three groups were 962.37 ± 93.81 N (Gr15) > 718.25 ± 93.71 N (Gr25) > 534.05 ±133.77 N (Gr0). Statistically significant difference (p < 0.0001) was found between all groups; Gr0 vs. Gr15, Gr0 vs. Gr25, Gr15 vs. Gr25. Conclusions: Contrary to expectations, the non-angulated monolithic zirconia abutments presented the lowest fracture resistance values. Angulating the abutments 15 or 25 degrees, following the palatal resorption pattern of the premaxilla, significantly increased the in vitro fracture resistance.
AB - Purpose: To investigate the fracture resistance and performance of zirconia when employed for the fabrication of implant abutments with different angulations, simulating anterior maxillary oral rehabilitation. Materials and Methods: Forty-five monolithic zirconia custom abutments of internal conical implant connection were CAD/CAM designed and fabricated. The specimens were divided into three groups (n = 15/group) according to implant-to-abutment angulation. The angulations used were; 0°, 15°, and 25°. The abutments were loaded until failure at 135° using the Universal Testing Machine (Instron, Canton, MA). Collected data were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey test. Results: Mean (±standard deviation) load at fracture of the zirconia abutments for the three groups were 962.37 ± 93.81 N (Gr15) > 718.25 ± 93.71 N (Gr25) > 534.05 ±133.77 N (Gr0). Statistically significant difference (p < 0.0001) was found between all groups; Gr0 vs. Gr15, Gr0 vs. Gr25, Gr15 vs. Gr25. Conclusions: Contrary to expectations, the non-angulated monolithic zirconia abutments presented the lowest fracture resistance values. Angulating the abutments 15 or 25 degrees, following the palatal resorption pattern of the premaxilla, significantly increased the in vitro fracture resistance.
KW - angulation
KW - bioengineering mechanics
KW - fracture resistance
KW - implant
KW - monolithic
KW - zirconia abutment
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85076118511&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85076118511&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/jopr.13127
DO - 10.1111/jopr.13127
M3 - Article
C2 - 31746068
AN - SCOPUS:85076118511
SN - 1059-941X
VL - 29
SP - 394
EP - 400
JO - Journal of Prosthodontics
JF - Journal of Prosthodontics
IS - 5
ER -