Abstract
In this paper we investigate the “mandatory-work-first” approach to parallel alpha–beta search first proposed by Akl, Barnard, and Doran. This approach is based on a version of alpha–beta search without deep cutoffs and a two-stage evaluation process, the second stage of which is often pruned. Our analysis shows that for best-first ordering on the lookahead tree, this approach provides greater speedup than the Palphabeta tree-splitting technique, and that for worst-first ordering, mandatory work first provides only slightly worse speedup than Palphabeta.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 89-92 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence |
| Volume | PAMI-5 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jan 1983 |
Keywords
- Alpha–beta search
- computer chess
- multiprocessing
- parallel algorithms
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Software
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Computational Theory and Mathematics
- Artificial Intelligence
- Applied Mathematics
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Improved Speedup Bounds for Parallel Alpha–Beta Search'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver