TY - JOUR
T1 - Improving ICU-Based Palliative Care Delivery
T2 - A Multicenter, Multidisciplinary Survey of Critical Care Clinician Attitudes and Beliefs
AU - Wysham, Nicholas G.
AU - Hua, May
AU - Hough, Catherine L.
AU - Gundel, Stephanie
AU - Docherty, Sharron L.
AU - Jones, Derek M.
AU - Reagan, Owen
AU - Goucher, Haley
AU - McFarlin, Jessica
AU - Cox, Christopher E.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2016 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
PY - 2017/4/1
Y1 - 2017/4/1
N2 - Objective: Addressing the quality gap in ICU-based palliative care is limited by uncertainty about acceptable models of collaborative specialist and generalist care. Therefore, we characterized the attitudes of physicians and nurses about palliative care delivery in an ICU environment. Design: Mixed-methods study. Setting: Medical and surgical ICUs at three large academic hospitals. Participants: Three hundred three nurses, intensivists, and advanced practice providers. Measurements and Main Results: Clinicians completed written surveys that assessed attitudes about specialist palliative care presence and integration into the ICU setting, as well as acceptability of 23 published palliative care prompts (triggers) for specialist consultation. Most (n = 225; 75%) reported that palliative care consultation was underutilized. Prompting consideration of eligibility for specialist consultation by electronic health record searches for triggers was most preferred (n = 123; 41%); only 17 of them (6%) felt current processes were adequate. The most acceptable specialist triggers were metastatic malignancy, unrealistic goals of care, end of life decision making, and persistent organ failure. Advanced age, length of stay, and duration of life support were the least acceptable. Screening led by either specialists or ICU teams was equally preferred. Central themes derived from qualitative analysis of 65 written responses to open-ended items included concerns about the roles of physicians and nurses, implementation, and impact on ICU team-family relationships. Conclusions: Integration of palliative care specialists in the ICU is broadly acceptable and desired. However, the most commonly used current triggers for prompting specialist consultation were among the least well accepted, while more favorable triggers are difficult to abstract from electronic health record systems. There is also disagreement about the role of ICU nurses in palliative care delivery. These findings provide important guidance to the development of collaborative care models for the ICU setting.
AB - Objective: Addressing the quality gap in ICU-based palliative care is limited by uncertainty about acceptable models of collaborative specialist and generalist care. Therefore, we characterized the attitudes of physicians and nurses about palliative care delivery in an ICU environment. Design: Mixed-methods study. Setting: Medical and surgical ICUs at three large academic hospitals. Participants: Three hundred three nurses, intensivists, and advanced practice providers. Measurements and Main Results: Clinicians completed written surveys that assessed attitudes about specialist palliative care presence and integration into the ICU setting, as well as acceptability of 23 published palliative care prompts (triggers) for specialist consultation. Most (n = 225; 75%) reported that palliative care consultation was underutilized. Prompting consideration of eligibility for specialist consultation by electronic health record searches for triggers was most preferred (n = 123; 41%); only 17 of them (6%) felt current processes were adequate. The most acceptable specialist triggers were metastatic malignancy, unrealistic goals of care, end of life decision making, and persistent organ failure. Advanced age, length of stay, and duration of life support were the least acceptable. Screening led by either specialists or ICU teams was equally preferred. Central themes derived from qualitative analysis of 65 written responses to open-ended items included concerns about the roles of physicians and nurses, implementation, and impact on ICU team-family relationships. Conclusions: Integration of palliative care specialists in the ICU is broadly acceptable and desired. However, the most commonly used current triggers for prompting specialist consultation were among the least well accepted, while more favorable triggers are difficult to abstract from electronic health record systems. There is also disagreement about the role of ICU nurses in palliative care delivery. These findings provide important guidance to the development of collaborative care models for the ICU setting.
KW - critical illness
KW - electronic health record
KW - palliative care
KW - patient reported outcomes
KW - patient-centeredness
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84987600976&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84987600976&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002099
DO - 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002099
M3 - Article
C2 - 27618270
AN - SCOPUS:84987600976
SN - 0090-3493
VL - 45
SP - e372-e378
JO - Critical Care Medicine
JF - Critical Care Medicine
IS - 4
ER -