Skip to main navigation
Skip to search
Skip to main content
University of Kentucky Home
LOGIN & Help
Home
Research units
Researchers
Projects & Grants
Research Output
Facilities & Equipment
Honors & Awards
Activities
Search by expertise, name or affiliation
In-Store Spending Dynamics: How Budgets Invert Relative-Spending Patterns
Daniel Sheehan
, Koert Van Ittersum
Marketing and Supply Chain
Research output
:
Contribution to journal
›
Article
›
peer-review
28
Scopus citations
Overview
Fingerprint
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'In-Store Spending Dynamics: How Budgets Invert Relative-Spending Patterns'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Sort by
Weight
Alphabetically
Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Fields
100%
Literature
100%
Brick
100%
Environment
100%
Research
100%
Technology
100%
Analytical Method
100%
Decision Making
100%
Arts and Humanities
Dynamics
100%
Budgets
100%
Relative
100%
Price
66%
Shopping
33%
trip
16%
Literature
16%
Controlled
16%
Salience
16%
Retail
16%
Feedback
16%
Realtime
16%
Convex
16%
Concave
16%
Product
16%
Strategy
16%
Analysis
16%
Influence
16%
Mobile Technology
16%
Category
16%
Decision-Making
16%
Cost
16%
Promotion
16%
Mediation
16%
Environment
16%
Marketing
16%
Mortar
16%
Brick
16%
Earth and Planetary Sciences
Price
100%
Strategy
25%
Literature
25%
Product
25%
Experiment
25%
Real Time
25%
Implication
25%
Promotion
25%
Mortar
25%
Field Study
25%
Brick
25%
Budgeting
25%
Feedback
25%
Category
25%
Research
25%
Analytical Method
25%
Technology
25%
Decision Making
25%
Marketing
25%
Social Sciences
Relative
100%
Budgets
100%
Price
66%
Research
16%
Contribution
16%
Category
16%
Marketing
16%
Influence
16%
Feedback
16%
Mobile Technology
16%
Budgetary Control
16%
Opportunity Cost
16%
Experiment
16%
Literature
16%
Brick
16%
Mediation Analysis
16%
Time
16%
Decision Making
16%
Environment
16%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Price
100%
Opportunity Cost
25%
Budgeting
25%