TY - JOUR
T1 - Inconsistencies between medical records and patient-reported recommendations for follow-up after abnormal pap tests
AU - Slone, Stacey
AU - White, Carol
AU - Shelton, Brent
AU - Van Meter, Emily
AU - Desimone, Christopher
AU - Schoenberg, Nancy
AU - Dignan, Mark
PY - 2013/2/1
Y1 - 2013/2/1
N2 - Purpose: Adherence with recommended follow-up after an abnormal Pap test is a critical step in the prevention of cervical cancer. Here, we focused on identifying inconsistencies between self-reported and health department record recommendations for follow-up. Methods: Self-reported recommendations for follow-up were collected by questionnaire from 519 women with abnormal Pap tests in rural Appalachia as part of a trial of the efficacy of patient navigation. Health department medical records were reviewed to collect healthcare provider recommendations. Measures of inconsistency (discordance) were calculated for overall recommendations and each of three particular follow-up recommendations: repeat Pap test, referral for further tests, and other gynecologist referral. Results: The inconsistencies between the recommendation from the health department records and self-reports ranged from 15.0% (repeat Pap test) to 35.3% (gynecologist referral). Inconsistencies were most common among women with a history of abnormal Pap tests and those with more severe initial results. Recommendations for repeat Pap tests were correctly reported most often when the women recalled receiving a letter stating the results. Of greatest concern were the inconsistencies regarding recommendations for referral to a gynecologist. The more severe the Pap test result, the greater the odds of inaccurate self-reports of receiving a referral to a gynecologist for follow-up, p<0.001. Conclusions: Clinicians should be aware that patients with a history of abnormal results and severe Pap test abnormalities are at risk of misreporting recommendations for follow up.
AB - Purpose: Adherence with recommended follow-up after an abnormal Pap test is a critical step in the prevention of cervical cancer. Here, we focused on identifying inconsistencies between self-reported and health department record recommendations for follow-up. Methods: Self-reported recommendations for follow-up were collected by questionnaire from 519 women with abnormal Pap tests in rural Appalachia as part of a trial of the efficacy of patient navigation. Health department medical records were reviewed to collect healthcare provider recommendations. Measures of inconsistency (discordance) were calculated for overall recommendations and each of three particular follow-up recommendations: repeat Pap test, referral for further tests, and other gynecologist referral. Results: The inconsistencies between the recommendation from the health department records and self-reports ranged from 15.0% (repeat Pap test) to 35.3% (gynecologist referral). Inconsistencies were most common among women with a history of abnormal Pap tests and those with more severe initial results. Recommendations for repeat Pap tests were correctly reported most often when the women recalled receiving a letter stating the results. Of greatest concern were the inconsistencies regarding recommendations for referral to a gynecologist. The more severe the Pap test result, the greater the odds of inaccurate self-reports of receiving a referral to a gynecologist for follow-up, p<0.001. Conclusions: Clinicians should be aware that patients with a history of abnormal results and severe Pap test abnormalities are at risk of misreporting recommendations for follow up.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84873642302&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84873642302&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1089/jwh.2011.3414
DO - 10.1089/jwh.2011.3414
M3 - Article
C2 - 23145889
AN - SCOPUS:84873642302
VL - 22
SP - 147
EP - 152
IS - 2
ER -