Abstract
Purpose – The paper seeks to extend selfdetermination theory (SDT) and the triple helix model of knowledge sharing to predict that betweenindustry differences in financial rewards and the quality of knowledgesharing motivation will explain the extent of useless, pseudoknowledge sharing. Design/methodology/approach Participants are certified management accountant (CMA) survey respondents in two industries: finance, insurance, and real estate (FIRE; n=52) and higher education (n=50). Findings Consistent with predictions, the results indicate more pseudoknowledge sharing occurs among FIRE than among highereducation CMAs, and, financial incentives and the quality of knowledgesharing motivation fully mediate the effect of industry on pseudoknowledge sharing. Research limitations/implications A larger sample, and triangulating the survey data with archival and nonselfreported measures, would strengthen the inferences and conclusions. Practical implications Industry culture, through its influence on financial rewards and organizational knowledge culture, may affect the success or failure of organizational knowledgesharing initiatives. Originality/value This is among the first investigations to define and investigate “dark”, pseudoknowledge sharing, which can impede organizational goals.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 841-857 |
Number of pages | 17 |
Journal | Journal of Knowledge Management |
Volume | 14 |
Issue number | 6 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Oct 26 2010 |
Keywords
- Knowledge management
- Knowledge sharing
- Organizational culture
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Strategy and Management
- Management of Technology and Innovation