Abstract
Chemical doping is widely used to manipulate the electrical and thermoelectric properties of organic semiconductors, yet intelligent design of polymer-dopant systems remains elusive. It is challenging to predict the electrical and thermoelectric properties of doped organic semiconductors due to the large number of variables impacting these properties, including film morphology, dopant and polymer energetics, dopant size, and degree of polaron delocalization. Herein, a series of dopants with varying sizes and electron affinities (EAs) are combined with polymers of differing ionization energies (IEs) to investigate how the difference between polymer IE and dopant EA influences the doping efficiency and electrical conductivity, and how the dopant size influences the thermoelectric properties. Our experiments demonstrate that at low doping levels the doping efficiency strongly depends on the difference between the polymer IE and dopant EA; the effectiveness of doping on increasing electrical conductivity drastically decreases at high loadings for the molybdenum dithiolene complexes, while FeCl3 remains effective at high loadings; and the large molybdenum complexes lead to more delocalized polarons as compared to FeCl3. To take advantage of the complementary doping characteristics of the molybdenum complexes and FeCl3, both dopants are employed simultaneously to reach high power factors at relatively low dopant concentrations.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 16495-16505 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | Journal of Materials Chemistry A |
| Volume | 6 |
| Issue number | 34 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2018 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2018 The Royal Society of Chemistry.
Funding
Z. L., K. R. G. and A. M. B. acknowledge the donors of The American Chemical Society Petroleum Research Fund for partial support of this research. This material is based upon work supported in part by the National Science Foundation under award No. DMR-1729737. M. S. appreciates nancial support from the National Science Foundation (Award number: DMR-1454200). J. M. appreciates the nancial support from the National Science Foundation (Award number: 1653909) and startup funds from Purdue University. This research used CMS beamline of the National Synchrotron Light Source II, a U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) office of Science User Facility operated for the DOE Office of Science by Brookhaven National Laboratory under contract No. DE-SC0012704. Z. L., K. R. G. and A. M. B. acknowledge the donors of The American Chemical Society Petroleum Research Fund for partial support of this research. This material is based upon work supported in part by the National Science Foundation under award No. DMR-1729737. M. S. appreciates financial support from the National Science Foundation (Award number: DMR-1454200). J. M. appreciates the financial support from the National Science Foundation (Award number: 1653909) and startup funds from Purdue University. This research used CMS beamline of the National Synchrotron Light Source II, a U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) office of Science User Facility operated for the DOE Office of Science by Brookhaven National Laboratory under contract No. DE-SC0012704.
| Funders | Funder number |
|---|---|
| US DOE Office of Science | |
| National Science Foundation (NSF) | 1653909, 1729737, DMR-1454200 |
| Michigan State University-U.S. Department of Energy (MSU-DOE) Plant Research Laboratory | |
| Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) | |
| Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis | |
| American Chemical Society Petroleum Research Fund | |
| National Science Foundation (NSF) | DMR-1729737 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Chemistry
- Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
- General Materials Science