Abstract
The Ohio River Basin (ORB) is responsible for 35% of total nitrate loading to the Gulf of Mexico yet controls on nitrate timing require investigation. We used a set of submersible ultraviolet nitrate analyzers located at 13 stations across the ORB to examine nitrate loading and seasonality. Observed nitrate concentrations ranged from 0.3 to 2.8 mg L−1 N in the Ohio River's mainstem. The Ohio River experiences a greater than fivefold increase in annual nitrate load from the upper basin to the river's junction with the Mississippi River (74–415 Gg year−1). The nitrate load increase corresponds with the greater drainage area, a 50% increase in average annual nitrate concentration, and a shift in land cover across the drainage area from 5% cropland in the upper basin to 19% cropland at the Ohio River's junction with the Mississippi River. Time-series decomposition of nitrate concentration and nitrate load showed peaks centered in January and June for 85% of subbasin-year combinations and nitrate lows in summer and fall. Seasonal patterns of the terrestrial system, including winter dormancy, spring planting, and summer and fall growing-harvest seasons, are suggested to control nitrate timing in the Ohio River as opposed to controls by river discharge and internal cycling. The dormant season from December to March carries 51% of the ORB's nitrate load, and nitrate delivery is high across all subbasins analyzed, regardless of land cover. This season is characterized by soil nitrate leaching likely from mineralization of soil organic matter and release of legacy nitrogen. Nitrate experiences fast transit to the river owing to the ORB's mature karst geology in the south and tile drainage in the northwest. The planting season from April to June carries 26% of the ORB's nitrate and is a period of fertilizer delivery from upland corn and soybean agriculture to streams. The harvest season from July to November carries 22% of the ORB's nitrate and is a time of nitrate retention on the landscape. We discuss nutrient management in the ORB including fertilizer efficiency, cover crops, and nitrate retention using constructed measures.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 635-651 |
Number of pages | 17 |
Journal | Journal of the American Water Resources Association |
Volume | 59 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Aug 2023 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2023 American Water Resources Association.
Funding
We gratefully acknowledge the financial support of this research from the Kentucky Senate Bill 271B Water Quality program and National Science Foundation Awards #1632888 and #1933779. Special thanks to U.S. Geological Survey field personnel in the Louisville, KY and Murray, KY Offices for their exceptional efforts in operating and maintaining the continuous nitrate sensors on the large rivers in the lower ORB. We thank the undergraduate students who assisted with data collection and processing.
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
U.S. Geological Survey | |
Directorate for Geosciences | 1933779 |
Directorate for Geosciences | |
National Science Foundation Arctic Social Science Program | 1632888 |
National Science Foundation Arctic Social Science Program |
Keywords
- Ohio River
- karst
- nitrate
- sensor
- tile drainage
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Ecology
- Water Science and Technology
- Earth-Surface Processes