TY - JOUR
T1 - Interference of cardiac pacemaker and implantable cardioverter- defibrillator activity during electronic dental device use
AU - Roedig, Jason J.
AU - Shah, Jignesh
AU - Elayi, Claude Samy
AU - Miller, Craig S.
PY - 2010/5
Y1 - 2010/5
N2 - Background. The authors conducted a study to determine if electromagnetic interference of cardiac pacemaker and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) activity occurs during the operation of electronic dental devices. Methods. The authors tested nine electronic dental devices in vitro to assess their ability to interfere with the function of two pacemakers and two ICDs as determined by electrocardiographic telemetry. Results. The pacing activity of both pacemakers and the dual-chamber ICD were inhibited during operation of the battery-operated composite curing light at between 2 and 10 centimeters from the generator or leads. The use of the ultrasonic scaler interfered with the pacing activity of the dual-chamber pacemaker at between 17 and 23 cm from the generator or leads, the single-chamber pacemaker at 15 cm from the generator or leads and both ICDs at 7 cm from the leads. The operation of the ultrasonic cleaning system interfered with the activity of the dual-chamber pacemaker at between 15 and 23 cm from the generator or leads, and of the single-chamber pacemaker at 12 cm. Operation of the electric toothbrush, electrosurgical unit, electric pulp tester, high- and low-speed handpieces, and an amalgamator did not alter pacing function. Conclusion. Select electronic dental devices interfere with pacemakers' and ICDs' sensing and pacing activity in vitro. Clinical Implications. Use of the ultrasonic scaler, ultrasonic cleaning system and battery-operated composite curing light may produce deleterious effects in patients who have pacemakers or ICDs.
AB - Background. The authors conducted a study to determine if electromagnetic interference of cardiac pacemaker and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) activity occurs during the operation of electronic dental devices. Methods. The authors tested nine electronic dental devices in vitro to assess their ability to interfere with the function of two pacemakers and two ICDs as determined by electrocardiographic telemetry. Results. The pacing activity of both pacemakers and the dual-chamber ICD were inhibited during operation of the battery-operated composite curing light at between 2 and 10 centimeters from the generator or leads. The use of the ultrasonic scaler interfered with the pacing activity of the dual-chamber pacemaker at between 17 and 23 cm from the generator or leads, the single-chamber pacemaker at 15 cm from the generator or leads and both ICDs at 7 cm from the leads. The operation of the ultrasonic cleaning system interfered with the activity of the dual-chamber pacemaker at between 15 and 23 cm from the generator or leads, and of the single-chamber pacemaker at 12 cm. Operation of the electric toothbrush, electrosurgical unit, electric pulp tester, high- and low-speed handpieces, and an amalgamator did not alter pacing function. Conclusion. Select electronic dental devices interfere with pacemakers' and ICDs' sensing and pacing activity in vitro. Clinical Implications. Use of the ultrasonic scaler, ultrasonic cleaning system and battery-operated composite curing light may produce deleterious effects in patients who have pacemakers or ICDs.
KW - Cardiac pacemaker
KW - Defibrillator
KW - Dental equipment
KW - Electromagnetic interference
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77953516595&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77953516595&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.14219/jada.archive.2010.0224
DO - 10.14219/jada.archive.2010.0224
M3 - Article
C2 - 20436099
AN - SCOPUS:77953516595
SN - 0002-8177
VL - 141
SP - 521
EP - 526
JO - Journal of the American Dental Association
JF - Journal of the American Dental Association
IS - 5
ER -