International consensus on the assessment of bruxism: Report of a work in progress

F. Lobbezoo, J. Ahlberg, K. G. Raphael, P. Wetselaar, A. G. Glaros, T. Kato, V. Santiago, E. Winocur, A. De Laat, R. De Leeuw, K. Koyano, G. J. Lavigne, P. Svensson, D. Manfredini

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

733 Scopus citations

Abstract

In 2013, consensus was obtained on a definition of bruxism as repetitive masticatory muscle activity characterised by clenching or grinding of the teeth and/or by bracing or thrusting of the mandible and specified as either sleep bruxism or awake bruxism. In addition, a grading system was proposed to determine the likelihood that a certain assessment of bruxism actually yields a valid outcome. This study discusses the need for an updated consensus and has the following aims: (i) to further clarify the 2013 definition and to develop separate definitions for sleep and awake bruxism; (ii) to determine whether bruxism is a disorder rather than a behaviour that can be a risk factor for certain clinical conditions; (iii) to re-examine the 2013 grading system; and (iv) to develop a research agenda. It was concluded that: (i) sleep and awake bruxism are masticatory muscle activities that occur during sleep (characterised as rhythmic or non-rhythmic) and wakefulness (characterised by repetitive or sustained tooth contact and/or by bracing or thrusting of the mandible), respectively; (ii) in otherwise healthy individuals, bruxism should not be considered as a disorder, but rather as a behaviour that can be a risk (and/or protective) factor for certain clinical consequences; (iii) both non-instrumental approaches (notably self-report) and instrumental approaches (notably electromyography) can be employed to assess bruxism; and (iv) standard cut-off points for establishing the presence or absence of bruxism should not be used in otherwise healthy individuals; rather, bruxism-related masticatory muscle activities should be assessed in the behaviour's continuum.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)837-844
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Oral Rehabilitation
Volume45
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2018

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 The Authors. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd

Funding

Dr. Lobbezoo reports Grants and Other from Sunstar Suisse S.A., grants from Somnomed Goedegebuure, outside the submitted work. Dr. Santiago reports grants from NIDCR, during the conduct of the study. Dr. Lavigne reports non-financial support from Somnomed Canada, personal fees from ResMed Usa, grants from Canada Res Chair, outside the submitted work. The other authors have stated

FundersFunder number
Sunstar Suisse S.A.
National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial ResearchR01DE024522
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science17K19753

    Keywords

    • assessment
    • awake bruxism
    • bruxism
    • clinical inspection
    • cut-off points
    • definition
    • electromyography
    • polysomnography
    • self-report
    • sleep bruxism

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • General Dentistry

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'International consensus on the assessment of bruxism: Report of a work in progress'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this