International institutional design and human rights: The case of the Inter-American Human Rights System

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Most studies examining the effectiveness of international human rights law treat international human rights institutions as equally (un)influential on state behavior. I argue that institutional design explains variation in state response to international human rights law. Using the institutions in the Inter-American Human Rights System (Court and Commission), I argue that judgments from the highly legalized body (Court) are associated with human rights improvements, while decisions from the less legalized body (Commission) are associated with a greater likelihood of formal complaints. Using the Ill-Treatment and Torture data and original data on Commission decisions, I find support for these expectations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)608-625
Number of pages18
JournalConflict Management and Peace Science
Volume36
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2019

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
I thank participants of the 2018 International Studies Association Panel on Will H. Moore’s Legacy, participants of the University of Kentucky Brown Bag series, Courtenay Conrad, Ryan Welch, as well as editors and reviewers of CMPS for their constructive feedback. The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2019.

Keywords

  • Human rights
  • international courts
  • international law

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Political Science and International Relations

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'International institutional design and human rights: The case of the Inter-American Human Rights System'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this