Abstract
Previous research indicates that a country's international commerce usually tracks the pattern of its diplomatic entanglements. As the evidence for this observation comes from overall trade statistics, however, analysts have had little ability to probe the sources of the linkage. This study uses major-power trade data from 1962 to 1997, disaggregated by economic sector, within an elaborated 'gravity model' that parses out some of the potential causal paths. Our results indicate that, while (1) commercial exchanges among major powers did 'follow the flag' (2) within all sectors during the period under study, not only those with immediately military value, (3) national traits that are causally prior to foreign relations, but often excluded from studies of international trade, also predicted trade in each sector, and (4) the major-power democracies did not show any particular favoritism to each other after these national differences in trade activity are considered.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 362-383 |
Number of pages | 22 |
Journal | International Politics |
Volume | 43 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jul 2006 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:1 We would like to thank the editor and the journals reviewers for comments on and assistance with earlier drafts. Bartilow received a grant from the University of Kentucky to fund the data collection and analysis.
Keywords
- Foreign relations
- International trade
- Major powers
- Military value
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Geography, Planning and Development
- Political Science and International Relations