Abstract
INTRODUCTION:Severe abdominal pain is a cardinal symptom of chronic pancreatitis (CP) associated with a high economic and societal burden. In other chronic pain conditions, cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) has demonstrated efficacy in improving patient outcomes (e.g., pain-related disability and depression). However, CBT has not yet been evaluated in adult patients with painful CP. We aimed to (i) evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of an adapted Internet CBT program for CP and (ii) generate pilot data regarding the effects of treatment on patient pain outcomes.METHODS:Thirty adults (mean age = 49.8 years, SD = 12.5; 80% women) with suspected or definite CP were randomized to Internet CBT (Pancreatitis Pain Course) versus control. The Pancreatitis Pain Course has 5 CBT lessons (e.g., thought challenging, relaxation, and activity pacing) delivered over 8 weeks. Pain interference, pain intensity, and quality of life were assessed at pretreatment, posttreatment, and the 3-month follow-up. Qualitative interviews were conducted at posttreatment with a subset of participants.RESULTS:Eighty percent of participants rated the program as highly acceptable; 64.3% completed all 5 lessons. Qualitative data revealed positive perceptions of program features, relevancy, and skills. Patients randomized to Internet CBT demonstrated moderate to large effects in reducing pain intensity and pain interference from baseline to 3 months. The proportion of treatment responders (>30% improvement) was significantly greater in the Internet-CBT group than in the control group (50% vs 13%, Fisher exact t test P = 0.04).DISCUSSION:In this first trial of CBT pain self-management in CP, feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy for reducing pain and disability were demonstrated. Future definitive trials of CBT are needed.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | E00373 |
| Journal | Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jun 18 2021 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2021 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. All rights reserved.
Funding
Financial support: Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Cancer Institute and National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases of the National Institutes of Health under award numbers U01 DK108306 (D.Y.), U01 DK108323 (E.F.), U01 DK126300 (G.T.), U01 DK108327 (D.L.C.), and U01 DK108288 (M.D.T., S.S.V., and T.M.P.). E.F.L. was supported by K23NS089966 from the National Institute of Neurologic Disorders and Stroke of the National Institutes of Health. K.S. was supported by a University of Washington Mary Gates Research Scholarship Award. B.F.D. was supported by an Australian NHMRC Career Development Fellowship. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
| Funders | Funder number |
|---|---|
| University of Washington Mary Gates Research | |
| National Institutes of Health (NIH) | U01 DK108288, U01 DK108306, U01 DK108327, U01 DK126300 |
| National Institutes of Health (NIH) | |
| National Childhood Cancer Registry – National Cancer Institute | |
| National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases | U01DK108323 |
| National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases | |
| Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke National Advisory Neurological Disorders and Stroke Council | K23NS089966 |
| Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke National Advisory Neurological Disorders and Stroke Council | |
| Australian National Health and Medical Research Council |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Gastroenterology