Abstract
Intra-individual variability (IIV) and psychological flexibility (PF) in affect both describe affective change over time (i.e., within-person variability). However, IIV and PF might differ from each other and predict different psychological and physical health outcomes. A large sample of adults (n = 793) completed two assessments of daily stress, daily affect, and health over a 10-year interval in The National Study of Daily Experiences (an 8-day daily diary portion of the Midlife Development in the United States study). IIV and PF in affect were modestly reliable within and between assessments. IIV, operationalized as total variability, predicted worse psychological and physical health concurrently and prospectively. PF, operationalized as changes in dimensionality, predicted better psychological and physical health concurrently and prospectively. Other operationalizations of PF were not consistently related to health. Within-person variability in affect could therefore be adaptive or maladaptive depending on how it was defined.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 13-21 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Journal of Research in Personality |
| Volume | 69 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Aug 2017 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:This research was supported by the National Institute on Aging ? United States Grants K02-AG033629, P01-AG020166, P01-AG0210166-02, and R01-AG19239 and the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Research Network. The authors thank Nilam Ram, Charles Carlson, Thomas Widiger, and Deborah Danner for their helpful suggestions on a previous version of this work.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Elsevier Inc.
Keywords
- Health
- Intra-individual variability
- MIDUS
- Negative affect
- Positive affect
- Psychological flexibility
- Within-person variability
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Social Psychology
- Psychology (all)