Abstract
Constructed wetlands mitigate nitrogen (N) loads in surface runoff, yet implications of common contaminant “cocktail” mixtures to wetland N removal are relatively unexplored. A 15N isotopic tracer was used to assess the impact contaminants from urban (imidacloprid, caffeine, and PFOS) and rural (atrazine, glyphosate, and sulfate) environments have on nitrogen (N) pathways in free-water surface wetlands (FWS) and floating treatment wetlands (FTW). Nitrate-N removal rates ranged from 0.20 to 0.68 d-1 and were dependent on the contaminant mixture and wetland design. Of the enriched 15N, biomass uptake accounted for 36.5 ± 30.7 %, 6.3 ± 4.2 % was denitrified and lost through air-water exchange, and 55.9 ± 24.4 % was assumed to have been denitrified and transmitted through plant tissues or lost due to ebullition (bubbling). The FTWs had increased temporary storage of N while the FWSs had increased permanent removal. In the presence of contaminant mixtures, both designs observed a shift in the NO3[sbnd]N removal pathway toward increased biomass uptake. Caffeine (59.7 ± 3.6 %), PFOS (65.9 ± 8.8 %), atrazine (92.0 ± 0.6 %), and glyphosate (>89.1 %) were effectively removed from the water with limited removal for SO42- (2.3 ± 12.3 %). Findings elucidate implications to N fate and maintenance required (e.g., biomass harvesting) in two constructed pulse-flow wetlands positioned in urban and rural landscapes while providing a clear understanding of how system design and water quality characteristics impact biogeochemical cycling.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 124294 |
| Journal | Water Research |
| Volume | 287 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Dec 1 2025 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2025
Funding
This project was supported by the National Science Foundation Grant No 2042761 and National Science Foundation Grant No 1922695 . This project was also supported with funds by the U.S. Hatch multistate capacity funding grants (W-4045 and KY006133A). Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official views of the U.S. Department of (USDA) and National Science Foundation. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government or USDA. USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.
| Funders | Funder number |
|---|---|
| U.S. Department of Agriculture | |
| U.S. Government or USDA | |
| National Science Foundation Arctic Social Science Program | KY006133A, 2042761, 1922695, W-4045 |
Keywords
- Constructed floating treatment wetlands
- Constructed free-water surface wetlands
- Contaminants of emerging concern
- Denitrification
- Perfluorooctane sulfonic acid
- Pesticides
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Environmental Engineering
- Civil and Structural Engineering
- Ecological Modeling
- Water Science and Technology
- Waste Management and Disposal
- Pollution
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Isotopically tracing the impact of water contaminant “cocktails” on nitrogen pathways in constructed treatment wetlands'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver