Juvenile and Family Court Judges’ Knowledge and Attitudes About Sex Trafficking of Minors: Associations with Gender, Race, and U.S. Region

Jennifer Cole, Ginny Sprang, Christine Leistner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Juvenile and family court judges are a professional group that have a significant amount of decision-making power in cases of sex trafficking of minors. The purpose of this project is to examine the association of juvenile and family court judges’ gender, race, and U.S. region with their attitudes and knowledge about sex trafficking of minors. Drawing from a survey of 55 juvenile and family court judges in the U.S., this study used standardized scales to measure attitudes and knowledge about child sex trafficking. Results indicate some differences by gender and geography in a sample of experienced judges across the U.S. The consistency of these findings are discussed in the context of other research and implications for targeted training.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)29-41
Number of pages13
JournalJuvenile and Family Court Journal
Volume71
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2020

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges

Keywords

  • child sex trafficking
  • decision-making
  • judicial

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Juvenile and Family Court Judges’ Knowledge and Attitudes About Sex Trafficking of Minors: Associations with Gender, Race, and U.S. Region'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this